Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
0
Comments
7412
Joined
2 yr. ago

I check the Media Bias Status for available pages on https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/

Block me if you dislike it.

If you like this to be activated on YOUR community, message the LW Team. ( See Sidebar )

  • Information for Salon:

    Wiki: mixed - There is no consensus on the reliability of Salon. Editors consider Salon biased or opinionated, and its statements should be attributed.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for Mother Jones:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that Mother Jones is generally reliable. Almost all editors consider Mother Jones a biased source, so its statements (particularly on political topics) may need to be attributed. Consider whether content from this publication constitutes due weight before citing it in an article.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for Vox:

    Wiki: reliable - Vox is considered generally reliable. Some editors say that Vox does not always delineate reporting and opinion content or that it is a partisan source in the field of politics. See also: Polygon, The Verge, New York


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for Raw Story:

    Wiki: unreliable - There is consensus that Raw Story is generally unreliable for factual reporting, based upon a pattern of publishing false and sensationalized stories. Editors almost unanimously agree that the source is biased and that in-text attribution should accompany each use of the source.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for The Guardian:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian's op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a "blogposts" tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for BBC:

    Wiki: reliable - BBC is a British publicly funded broadcaster. It is considered generally reliable. This includes BBC News, BBC documentaries, and the BBC History site (on BBC Online). However, this excludes BBC projects that incorporate user-generated content (such as h2g2 and the BBC Domesday Project) and BBC publications with reduced editorial oversight (such as Collective). Statements of opinion should conform to the corresponding guideline.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for CNN:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that news broadcast or published by CNN is generally reliable. However, iReport consists solely of user-generated content, and talk show content should be treated as opinion pieces. Some editors consider CNN biased, though not to the extent that it affects reliability.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for BBC:

    Wiki: reliable - BBC is a British publicly funded broadcaster. It is considered generally reliable. This includes BBC News, BBC documentaries, and the BBC History site (on BBC Online). However, this excludes BBC projects that incorporate user-generated content (such as h2g2 and the BBC Domesday Project) and BBC publications with reduced editorial oversight (such as Collective). Statements of opinion should conform to the corresponding guideline.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for Deutsche Welle:

    Wiki: reliable - Deutsche Welle is a German state-owned international broadcaster. It is considered generally reliable. Some editors consider that the quality of DW depends on the language edition.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Germany


    Information for Deutsche Welle:

    Wiki: reliable - Deutsche Welle is a German state-owned international broadcaster. It is considered generally reliable. Some editors consider that the quality of DW depends on the language edition.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Germany


    Information for Deutsche Welle:

    Wiki: reliable - Deutsche Welle is a German state-owned international broadcaster. It is considered generally reliable. Some editors consider that the quality of DW depends on the language edition.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Germany


    Information for Deutsche Welle:

    Wiki: reliable - Deutsche Welle is a German state-owned international broadcaster. It is considered generally reliable. Some editors consider that the quality of DW depends on the language edition.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Germany


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for BBC:

    Wiki: reliable - BBC is a British publicly funded broadcaster. It is considered generally reliable. This includes BBC News, BBC documentaries, and the BBC History site (on BBC Online). However, this excludes BBC projects that incorporate user-generated content (such as h2g2 and the BBC Domesday Project) and BBC publications with reduced editorial oversight (such as Collective). Statements of opinion should conform to the corresponding guideline.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for Salon:

    Wiki: mixed - There is no consensus on the reliability of Salon. Editors consider Salon biased or opinionated, and its statements should be attributed.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support