Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
0
Comments
7412
Joined
2 yr. ago

I check the Media Bias Status for available pages on https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/

Block me if you dislike it.

If you like this to be activated on YOUR community, message the LW Team. ( See Sidebar )

  • Information for The Wall Street Journal:

    Wiki: reliable - Most editors consider The Wall Street Journal generally reliable for news. Use WP:NEWSBLOG to evaluate the newspaper's blogs, including Washington Wire. Use WP:RSOPINION for opinion pieces.


    MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for The Independent:

    Wiki: reliable - The Independent, a British newspaper, is considered a reliable source for non-specialist information. In March 2016, the publication discontinued its print edition to become an online newspaper; some editors advise caution for articles published after this date.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for The Independent:

    Wiki: reliable - The Independent, a British newspaper, is considered a reliable source for non-specialist information. In March 2016, the publication discontinued its print edition to become an online newspaper; some editors advise caution for articles published after this date.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for CNN:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that news broadcast or published by CNN is generally reliable. However, iReport consists solely of user-generated content, and talk show content should be treated as opinion pieces. Some editors consider CNN biased, though not to the extent that it affects reliability.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for Salon:

    Wiki: mixed - There is no consensus on the reliability of Salon. Editors consider Salon biased or opinionated, and its statements should be attributed.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for The Intercept:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Intercept is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider The Intercept a biased source, so uses may need to be attributed. For science, editors prefer peer-reviewed journals over news sources like The Intercept.Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Intercept is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider The Intercept a biased source, so uses may need to be attributed. For science, editors prefer peer-reviewed journals over news sources like The Intercept.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for The Atlantic:

    Wiki: reliable - The Atlantic is considered generally reliable. Editors should beware that The Atlantic does not always clearly delineate between reporting and opinion content; opinion pieces, including all articles in the "Ideas" column (theatlantic.com/ideas/), are governed by WP:RSOPINION.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for Jacobin:

    Wiki: reliable - Jacobin is a U.S.-based magazine that describes itself as a leading voice of the American left, offering socialist perspectives on politics, economics, and culture. There is a consensus that Jacobin is a generally reliable but biased source. Editors should take care to adhere to the neutral point of view policy when using Jacobin as a source in articles, for example by quoting and attributing statements that present its authors' opinions, and ensuring that due weight is given to their perspective amongst others'. The reliability of articles authored by Branko Marcetic has been considered questionable.


    MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for The Hill:

    Wiki: reliable - The Hill is considered generally reliable for American politics. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. The publication's contributor pieces, labeled in their bylines, receive minimal editorial oversight and should be treated as equivalent to self-published sources.


    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for The New York Times:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New York Times is generally reliable. WP:RSOPINION should be used to evaluate opinion columns, while WP:NEWSBLOG should be used for the blogs on The New York Times's website. The 2018 RfC cites WP:MEDPOP to establish that popular press sources such as The New York Times should generally not be used to support medical claims.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


    Information for Media Bias/Fact Check:

    Wiki: unreliable - There is consensus that Media Bias/Fact Check is generally unreliable, as it is self-published. Editors have questioned the methodology of the site's ratings.


    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for Bloomberg:

    Wiki: reliable - Bloomberg publications, including Bloomberg News and Bloomberg Businessweek, are considered generally reliable for news and business topics. See also: Bloomberg profiles.Wiki: mixed - Bloomberg company and executive profiles are generally considered to be based on company press releases and should only be used as a source for uncontroversial information. There is consensus that these profiles should not be used to establish notability. Some editors consider these profiles to be akin to self-published sources. See also: Bloomberg.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


    Information for Media Bias/Fact Check:

    Wiki: unreliable - There is consensus that Media Bias/Fact Check is generally unreliable, as it is self-published. Editors have questioned the methodology of the site's ratings.


    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Information for Kyiv Independent:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Ukraine


    Wikipedia search about this source

    Information for Media Bias/Fact Check:

    Wiki: unreliable - There is consensus that Media Bias/Fact Check is generally unreliable, as it is self-published. Editors have questioned the methodology of the site's ratings.


    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United States of America


    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support