I've never had a problem with it since I read an article showing that if you don't have dlc then basically you just get less game. And for this game it doesn't matter, unless you're doing multiple playthrough or you only want malkavian then it won't even affect your gameplay experience.
Ugurcan is part of the studio. It's not hard to be confused though because there was a very long time in development and they halfway transitioned to using ravencourt as a publisher for console stuff.
They are finally coming out with a sailing dlc this year and I'm hopeful they will eventually make a new brytenwalda Viking dlc.
Some things will cause you to probably get cancer like using tobacco heavily but there isn't any way to make yourself healthier really, if you're going to have a major medical problem like random cancer it's going to happen. Being healthier just makes it easier to resist it or have a better chance of survival.
I had to have a pre employment drug test once, and one part was literally just a breathalyzer. It was vaguely confusing because why wouldn't you just not drink before a test, but it's actually for people that are alcoholics and their BAC never goes to 0 or they just drink all the time.
It's not like sterilizing is free either, it uses a lot of heat energy which in most places means you're burning methane on the grid. That also releases co2 emissions.
Really cheap ground driving or walking drones can be an effective way to rapidly clear minefields too. It's a good area for decoys too. If some of them have advanced thermal sensors and maybe some weapons then they'll be a target for the enemy but you can have a bunch of real cheap dogshit versions that can't do much more than move forward.
Also there is still the air breathing battery technology, which isnt ready but is very high performance, double the charge or half the size. The limitation is something that might not matter for one time use drones, where the limitation is that the batteries corrode and don't have many recharge cycles. That's bad for phones but fine for disposable drones. I expect that will be a thing within 5 years.
It depends. If you start a war with a reasonable stockpile of artillery and shells then you will have a greater amount of shells than firing pieces at the start. So you can fire with your guns but you can get a big advantage if you can fire more than your opponent in the first round of fire and in the first few days. So if you can have a bunch of these cheapo things then you could effectively double or triple your rate of fire for a short period. That can be a big advantage if it means you break through fortifications or disabled anti air defense. They can move faster and be more responsive than moving artillery pieces around especially in rough terrain.
So you want both really. Having more options is better.
South Park Trump was kinder and more loving with hot gay sex than the real trump ever was. The boredom and stupidity of real life is too much to artificially recreate.
At this point, they have like a 5-7% chance of dying every year based on actuary tables. So dying at any point at that age isn't remarkable or unlikely. But there's like a 0-8 year range where it's likely to occur based on that.
Just Sync