Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L

Linus_Torvalds

@ Linus_Torvalds @lemmy.world

Posts
5
Comments
50
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Nintendo is going after the developers of the open source switch emulator Yuzu

    Jump

  • a) Your license footer is really cool! I will start including it as well.

    b) Aren't quotes a bit problematic, as you include them in your work? This one is probably fine, as you (quite artistically) paraphrased it but direct quotes would be a problem, right?

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • It's joever. Tachiyomi will no longer be actively developed.

    Jump

  • Unironically thank you for licensing your comments! :)

  • Pendant la période des fêtes de fin d'année, pas de stream sur la chaîne Twitch formamac 😮

    Jump

  • "cabbage_colonialist"

  • Predirect: A manifest v3 web extension with minimal permissions to automatically redirect popular sites to privacy friendly frontends

    Jump

  • Wait, does FF on Android only support Manifest v3 extensions?

  • ONLYOFFICE 7.5 Released with New PDF Editor + More

    Jump

  • OnlyOffice vs LibreOffice?

  • What would be the best spyware free smart watch?

    Jump

  • Pebble is a discontinued smartwatch developed by Pebble Technology Corporation.

    😶

  • Easiest way to bookmark YouTube ads?

    Jump

  • You could write a macro/userscript(Grease/TemperMonkey? idk) that does your manual steps automcatically?

  • Search engines compared

    Jump

  • I just love what has become of this thread:

    • Think it's a nice post
    • Look for Google/Kagi, but they're missing
    • People ask for sources, realize OP has chart from VERY dodgy conspiracy website
    • People start accusing Kagi Support of lying to their face, Screenshota of convo attached
    • Other users don't think its a lie, rather a misunderstanding
    • Insults start
    • ?

  • Can someone please explain why not to use Brave browser ?

    Jump

  • For further explanation of any point, please hit me up :)

    • It is Chromium based
    • It has used dubious methods in the past (replacing links with affiliate links, the whole ad/crypto thing, ...)
    • Brave's business model relies on ads (I think)
    • [This is a weak point, but at least in the privacy community, Brave isn't super popular. It feels more geared towards the "hyped crypto early adopters". [1] It might be "fine" for someone switching from Chrome (which is always a good thing) but going all the way would be a modded Firefox.]

    TL;DR For most provacy concious Brave users, Brave is a step in their journey towards more privacy, and not the final destination.

    [1] The "dumb AF tech youtubers" you mentioned in another post are typically the Brave hype crowd. This is not meant to discredit Brave; it's just that a share of their users are this way.