By combining GrapheneOS’s pioneering engineering with Motorola’s decades of security expertise, real‑world user insights, and Lenovo’s ThinkShield solutions, the collaboration will advance a new generation of privacy and security technologies. In the coming months, Motorola and the GrapheneOS Foundation will continue to collaborate on joint research, software enhancements, and new security capabilities, with more details and solutions to roll out as the partnership evolves.
I'm optimistic, but worried that this'll be a moto phone with a graphene skin.
Otherwise, it could turn out like OEM Windows (re: moto-graphene) with a ton of bloatware VS windows (re: OSS graphene).
Thank you for the well thought out response.
I know you didn't create this data, but wouldn't "by weight" or "by volume" have a more meaningful impact on reducing the amount of plastic in our oceans?
I feel like it's like going into an ice cream shop and claiming that "sprinkles are the most common thing being sold, by count.". Yeah, it is but it's dwarfed in comparison to the volume of ice cream being sold.
I'll certainly give you this. If I'm on a ship, with an open plastic bottle and a gust of wind comes along. It'll certainly blow the cap into the ocean before I'd lose my bottle.
On the other hand, I'm currently in a land-locked region - so the chance the wind will blow my cap into the ocean is low.
I did a bit more homework, which gives me a bit of a reason to pause. According to The Ocean Cleanup Project:
Other thing to note (from the link above):
So, I guess the intention behind the tethering is that the PET bottle will sink, taking the cap with it, which means it won't travel as far to get into the ocean (but is still sitting in in our waterways).
(rubbing my temples)... this seems like a really convoluted way to "fix" the problem and will only mitigate the issue, if you have these tethered cap near these 1000 rivers.