Bash has its upsides too, like the fact that it has arrays / lists and dictionaries / hashmaps. In my opinion, it gets iffy though when you need to do stuff with IFS; at that point one might be better off just using specialized tools.
Not saying working bash isn't good enough, but it can break in very surprising ways is my experience.
Not sure I'd call what bash has functions. They're closer to subroutines in Basic than functions in other languages, as in you can't return a value from them (they can only return their exit code, and you can capture their stdout and stderr). But even then, they are full subshells. It's one of the reasons I don't really like Bash, you're forced into globally or at least broadly-scoped variables. Oh, and I have no clue right now how to find where in your pipe you got a non-null exit code.
It's not a big problem for simple scripting, but it makes things cumbersome once you try to do more.
In all seriousness though, the core of the technical stack has become very robust in my opinion (DNS being the exception). From a hobbyist's perspective, things work much better than when the Web was still young. I can run multiple sites (some of them being what are today called apps) on a domain with subdomains, everything fast, HTTP3-capable, secured via valid free TLS certs, reverse proxied, all of that running on a system deployed in minutes...
If you focus on the part of the Internet that you have control over, it's a lot better than back in the simple days.
I love the idea that they have a complete technology stack from silicon to every application they run and we just happened to catch a glimpse into the bootloader layer of it.
Zumindest obliegen diesem Zwischenhändler dann gewisse Pflichten.
Du hast mit deinem Punkt natürlich durchaus Recht, allerdings denke ich, dass es ein Schritt in die richtige Richtung ist. Als nächstes könnte man windige Marktplatz-Händler ins Zielkreuz nehmen...
Not sure the term applies to MS Teams. It was always a rushed shitty product, pushed onto customers during COVID when companies like Zoom gained tons of users. Few people if any asked for it
Bonfire itself is a framework that implemented ActivityPub, on it you can build applications that make use of it without developing from the ground up. Bonfire Social is a social network similar to Mastodon. Collaboration is is about project management etc and allows one to host their own, but integrate with others, e.g. to synchronize milestones via federation. What they have in common is that both build on Bonfire and as such use the same protocol for federation. But they're tools for very different jobs.
Es gibt bei AliExpress allerdings halt auch sehr gute Hersteller. Ich habe da z.B. letztens einen leverless Controller direkt beim Hersteller bestellt. Den davor von gleichen noch bei Amazon über einen Händler bzw. Importeur, was aber beim letzten Produkt nicht möglich war.
Ich wüsste allerdings nicht, dass es auf Temu wirklich namhafte Hersteller gibt. Ich würde da gar nix bestellen. In mehrerer Hinsicht zu riskant, nur um dann Schrott zu Hause zu haben...
Bash has its upsides too, like the fact that it has arrays / lists and dictionaries / hashmaps. In my opinion, it gets iffy though when you need to do stuff with IFS; at that point one might be better off just using specialized tools.
Not saying working bash isn't good enough, but it can break in very surprising ways is my experience.