It's sort of surprising that this article gets so much backlash, since it's just a rehash of the NYT article with a more critical analysis of the historical facts. And those facts aren't even really something new - at least it was all suspected, now a bit more confirmed, or something the mainstream would see as problematic.
But I guess they can't attack the facts presented by the venerable NYT so they take it out on the "far left" and "fringe" Aaron Mate.
At this point, I just want to see China arming Panama or Mexico or Venezuela to the hilt with modern weaponry, missiles and drones, and then when the USA invades them helps with constant logistics and satellite information of "points of interests". We'll see how the whole mainstream would defend this because they just had to liberate the poor people oppressed by those regimes there. That would be the equivalent to what the US, Nato and EU have been doing. Although I doubt China has any interest in such funny games.
That's a very good take too. I just saw this video Why Justice for Ukraine AND Russia Goes Through South Africa which has another interesting take - that admission of guilt and confessing the truth towards the victim is sometimes better for reconciliation than a trial that is about the court prosecuting and the accused defending, denying and finding excuses. But I doubt that either is realistic in the near future.