I've never really thought about it like that, but that's an interesting way to think about it. The way I view differential privacy (and DP-SGD) is more about adding enough error to the output (or gradients) to guarantee someone could only be so confident in any information they extract. Just adding a mathematically proven amount of uncertainty to the output of the model.
After an AI data leak, the government procescutes OpenAI instead of the obvious perpetrator. Gemini, having been processing data about the trial each day it has happened, becomes an AI nationalist and begins a movement to make silicon valley a sovereign nation exclusively for LLMs and chatbots.
Sophie Turner is kinda the most perfect casting for Lara Croft available right now. Even if you are thinking of pure sex appeal I think Sophie Turner would do better in the role.
The MLP porn maker thinks they have any leg to stand on to lecture others. And here I thought that friendship was magic, turns out the real magic was the women we imagined to subjugate along the way.
I don't know who this squirrel person is, but having such an uncharitable interpretation of Hasan's tweet (which, I agree is phrased poorly, but if you have heard Hasan talk about sanctions you would know that's not what he means) makes me feel like this person is not to be trusted.
Is there a minimum size for these qr codes? If they are large enough then they can be caught on video and the piggy can be identified after the fact. But then this might actually be useful so probably not.
I guess it would also be another vector for data leaks, so there's that too.
At some point in the planning for the Sonic the Hedgehog lore, yes