Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K
Posts
7
Comments
3721
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • this guy is an utter dipshit, he should be impeached, if that's even possible lmao.

  • the paper doesnt necessarily need to absorb the ink, the ink just needs to dry on the surface is such a way that it adheres well enough it doesn't rub off, or stay wet.

    So really, you want a high adhesion, quick drying ink, which would basically let you write on any surface it'll stick to.

  • yeah no i did a meme, i think the kids refer to these as a "funny"

    the joke here being that "liberals did this" just a bit of banter.

    but yeah, where the fuck is everybody?

  • Them calling it “unlimited” when there’s a limit is wrong, but so is using all of the available upload bandwidth 100% of the time on a cheap home VPN service when you consider the current market prices for data transfer. Mine’s limited to 2Mbps. Seems fair for $7/month or whatever it is.

    they shouldn't make it unlimited them, skill issue on their part.

    If you're selling me 1Gb networking speeds, with no bandwidth limit, it's not my fault for using all of it lol. I'm just using what i pay for.

  • if somebody does a little torrenting you can just hand wave it, but if someone is doing all of the torrenting, you pretty clearly know about it.

  • yeah no i understood that part, but aside from the title saying that cops shoot it yearly? It's not anywhere in the text block i can see, maybe it's in the source article? But then why wasn't it included here either?

    That's why im asking, there has to be a reason, it's not just cops unlawfully discharging firearms into the gravestone of someone that is not their family, i.e. illegal vandalism.

  • no, it's just an example of something that would be considered both cruel, and unusual punishment, to provide a sufficient example.

    You can't just look at something like nitrogen gassing and go "its cruel because it's killing someone, and also unusual because it isn't utilized often" It has to be literally cruel, as in, you shouldn't do it period (general US laws would forbid it kind of a thing) and unusual in the sense that you would literally never do it.

  • they just didn't shoot him enough

  • dear big tech companies, please continue doing it, i want more people to use linux.

  • it's a bowl, it's like trying to pick up a gold bar, how are you meant to get ANY leverage on it without using a knife or something?

  • they're all equally responsible, fuck it, equitable execution.

  • well no, nitrogen gassings aren't "cruel", they're novel.

    What they mean when they say cruel and unusual is some shit like strapping a guy into a 2007 camry, sending it down a mountain into a fucking lake, until he drowns.

  • good, fuck every other kind of execution.

    Obviously capital punishment isn't ideal. But this one actually works so lmao.

  • hi, liberal here, we've been wondering this same thing since day one.

    Curious why nobody is questioning it in the media.

  • are you give me an actual reason or?

  • are you arguing that cops aren't people?

  • Even that article is wrong bcs there are plenty videos where the public see this dupe get on the roof 30 minutes before, not just “one kid”.

    i didn't say one kid saw him? And getting up there 20 minutes before the rally is not "a long time" that's 20 minutes. Should they have known about it? Yes, did they? Yes. Did the ground police do anything about it? No, because they didn't have functional communication.

    No way this would happen in reality.

    i mean this is literally the one valid explanation for why this managed to happen at all, the only other option is that it was a complete conspiracy, and i've seen no evidence to support that, and given the fact that police, and secret service, are two different entities, i'm going to align with the former.

    Reporting he was “shot trough the ear” and not having any sign of any wound 4 days later in 4K close ups is not possible.

    he wasn't "shot through the ear" the reporting is just wrong. It's evident from the video, from the bleeding, and from the wound, he simply wasn't "shot in the ear" he was grazed by a bullet at best, cut his ear on the way down at worst.

    Extended healthcare can’t do miracles. What a laughable excuse.

    for a minor injury? Yeah it can. I've seen 2nd degree burns go away in a couple of days from ointment. Shits wack when you have the right tools for the job.

    Sure, do you actually believe the potocol is no to take into account a second shooter?

    that's possible, but are there are any good circumstances for this to be the case? Even when he did stand up, SS was crowded around him, it would be very difficult to take a good shot from that point, at which point SS are likely watching like a hawk.

    And you admit he got up after this.

    i mean yeah... If you watch the video, he literally does this. The most famous image of that year was literally him standing. Like idk why you're acting like this is WITHOUT A DOUBT proof that it's conspiracy, it's evident that it happened.

    Standing there wanting to get his shoes and then having his planned photo.

    not everybody thinks clearly in situations like this, especially old people, the job of the SS is to protect him, if they deemed it unimportant, they would've carted him off sooner.

    The SS stood somewhat around him, in no way were they ‘piled up’ on his as they should be constantly.

    you can literally watch the video, the center mass of his body is very clearly blocked, the head is not a particularly good target, as evidenced by the fact that he fucking missed.

    Shinzo Abe or other events are irrelevant.

    I mean yeah, to this particular event, but do you think his killing was a conspiracy?

    OC attempts can happen, but here nothing adds up and you can’t but laugh at this pathetic spectacle or the fools believing it.

    i mean, it's literally just weird at best, i've seen weirder, look at any shooting through history. They're all weird as fuck.

  • yeah that's technically true, but they've done basically everything they already can, nothing happening today is "new" it's old news. That's what i mean when i say "lame duck"

    And technically, from the perspective of nearly no consequences, this is literally a lame duck president all the way through, but that's not really a fully accurate telling.

    you don't need to tell me what this administration is bad at, trust me, i know.

  • if we're talking gravity physics, the earth, by basically every possible kilogram of mass imaginable to the human mind. But this goes without saying, because you stick to the earth, the earth doesn't stick to you, so.

    Of course technically, the force is applied to both objects, but considering the scale mismatch, one of these things is not like the other.