Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K
Posts
3
Comments
836
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Everyone's aware here, too. If you were to ask most conservative voters about packaging plastic, they would likely agree that there's way too much, or at worst not care.

    PP is specifically politicising it because people kindof hate paper straws, and he will use any displeasure to slip his dick in.

  • It also geographically connects Acadia and Newfoundland to the rest of Canada, wildly weakening Atlantic Canada's ties to government and the rest of the country, and completely torpedoing east/west trade.

  • "And fuck power levels"

  • The difference, fundamentally, is that Carney studies markets, while Milhouse worships them.

  • Yes, they are. Because they're limited in their context.

    Corporate ownership of housing, regulatory changes made by the Harper government, amd the state turning away from developing public housing 40 years ago created the housing crisis.

  • Threaten the students, and the universities join right in. Threaten their money, though...

  • "I'm mad at the Liberals"

    NDP support crashes.

    "I like this new Liberal guy!"

    NDP support crashes.

    There's more to the dynamic than just "Liberals bad".

  • Enough NDP voters' second choice is the CPC that the Liberals are doing the things to attract that demographic. Look at the polling right now. The only people stumping for the NDP are the ones who will walk over toxic broken glass to vote against the Liberals.

  • Read the abstract, then read the conclusion. If you want to dig deeper into the findings, read the discussion section. Unless you're interested in the minutia of the methods or the research context, you can skip the rest of the paper.

  • Stupid sexy cows

  • Social media in general just isn't a good archive of information. It's a discussion space -- a living space -- not an archive.

    If you want information archives, you should creating websites for that specifically.

  • A lot of comments in here have real "I'd beat my kids" vibes, and that's kind of shocking and scary.

  • It takes a village to raise a child. The village abandoned them. This is on society as a whole.

  • Because they ran out of logos that look like all-seeing robotic eyes

  • They could use a good burning to the ground. Monopolist union busters do not support Canadians or Canada.

  • We've been we wealth-gating immigration for decades. That strategy was practically designed to increase the conservative-voting population

  • There was a survey. Many of us made staffers aware. And former councilor Waye Mason had a Mastodon account that he abandoned back in October. Council is aware. They have clearly just quietly rejected the idea.

  • I think they imagine that the resources for women were spontaneously built by governments, and it's not fair that governments don't do that for men, too!

    The idea that the support networks were started by women in their homes, with zero public support for decades until they managed to demand it by building grassroots support might be totally alien to their sea-lioning ass.

  • "Who is "they"?

    And who do you think started and operates most of the resource centres for women?