Child safety as a pretext for mandatory digital ID and state surveillance over political speech.

It’s right there in the flair and people can choose whether they see that content on their settings.

The post has an AI flair so if you don’t want to read this content you can just block it also stop policing what people can or cannot do ill use AI as much as a want what are you going to persecute next spellcheckers? Give me a break.

deleted by creator

You better not use any words he uses. /s Braindead argument.

I’ve written an article about my opinions on the topic. The Opium of the Labels: How Woke Moralism Serves Capital

There it is—when the name-calling fails, just double down on it. You’ve got nothing but labels and hostility, which is exactly why working people don’t take you seriously.

Classic—no argument, just name-calling. You’ve called me a homophobe and now a racist in under an hour without a single quote to back it up. This lazy labeling is exactly why working people tune out and drift right. And btw, the fascists are the ones who disregard words and choose violence instead—maybe you’re the fascist here. How do you like my virtue signaling?

I agree that queer and marginalized workers face unique and heightened exploitation under capitalism—that’s a material reality I don’t dispute—but my point is that you’re treating these struggles as separate from class rather than interwoven with it, and by demanding absolute ideological conformity on every social issue as a prerequisite for solidarity, you’re fracturing the very working-class unity needed to fight the system that exploits all of us; the goal isn’t to ignore specific oppressions but to build a broad coalition where we can disagree on tactics and phrasing while still recognizing our shared enemy, because without that unity, we’re just fighting each other while capital wins.

You’re proving my point by framing this as a binary choice—either adopt your specific brand of identity politics or be a bigot—and that’s not dialectics, it’s gatekeeping that ignores the actual class struggle while you police my language instead of focusing on material exploitation like child labor or wage slavery that affects all workers regardless of identity; solidarity isn’t built on purity tests, it’s built on shared economic interest, and when you alienate workers for not using perfect phrasing, you’re just shrinking the tent until it only fits your clique while the real world burns under capitalism.

Did that really work with Hogwarts Legacy? I remember people buying multiple copies just to spite the boycott. If you push harder with this kind of moral absolutism, you’re not building solidarity—you’re creating backlash. The more you label and exclude, the more you hand ammunition to the far-right. That’s not class consciousness; that’s performative purity testing that alienates the very people we need to organize.

Morgan Freeman: if you want to get rid of racism just stop talking about it.

Proving my point: Your divisive rhetoric pushes the working class toward fascism by ignoring material conditions for identity politics. Do you care about child labor exploitation, or just labels? You’re a bourgeois moralist who doesn’t care about exploitation—just virtue-signaling. You derail discussions towards imperialist talking points rather than focus on what’s important.

Opposing transphobia is class solidarity. Dividing the working class by excluding marginalized voices only weakens us all.

Could you be more specific? Because to me it feels like you are just making up stuff.

The CIA Document That Predicted Wokism (1985)

There goes another ‘leftist’ virtue-signaling, doing the job of three-letter agencies by creating division among the people.

It’s like a chat, you see the last messages posted on it from your instance, federated instances or all sites.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

     1. Do you think workers deserve more say in how their workplace is run?
     2. Should essential services like healthcare and education exist for public good rather than profit?
     3. Do you think the gap between rich and poor is a real problem?
     4. Should governments break up monopolies and limit corporate consolidation?
     5. Do you think large social media companies have too much power over public discourse?
     6. Should businesses prioritise worker safety and environmental impact over shareholder returns?
     7. Is it important to you that your data isn't owned or controlled by a single corporation?
     8. Do you prefer supporting independent creators over large corporate media?
     9. When choosing software, do you prioritise free/open-source options?
    10. Do you think countries have a responsibility to accept people fleeing war and hardship?
    11. Is it valuable to hear perspectives from people outside your own country?
    12. Do you prefer content that teaches you something over content that's just entertainment?
    13. Are you skeptical of people who promote get-rich-quick schemes or crypto as easy money?
    14. Should creators be fully transparent about sponsorships and who pays them?
    15. Should everyone be free to live as their authentic self regardless of identity?