And you think they just did it because?They obviously thought they deserved it, because... technology reduced the need for work hours, perhaps?
Unions fought for it after seeing the obvious effects of better technology reducing the need for work hours.
technological advancement doesn’t allow you to work less,It literally has (When forced by unions). How do you think we got the 40-hr workweek?
We should use them to replace workers, letting everyone work less and have more time to do what they want.We shouldn't let corporations use them to replace workers, because workers won't see any of the benefits.
Ah well I have a 13th gen laptop I use primarily for emulation on-the-go, so if linux was even halfway decent, I'd probably switch it over.
I endorse invalidating the 2 party system by not participating in the 2 party system and forcing reform.And how do you plan to do that before shit turns bad?You shouldn't just ignore elections as if they won't affect you. Unless you have a plan to fix it before the next one. So what's your plan?
Do you also attack dictionaries for explaining offensive words?If they use them in an obviously offensive way, yes.The person who gave the explanation is the same person who initially used it to mean offense. You can check the usernames to see exactly this.They're an ass. There is no messenger.
(I recall reading that the damage is proportional to the vehicle weight to the fourth power, probably with some more nuance)Yes. Road damage is based on vehicle weight. To the 4th power, yes. Heavier vehicles do exponentially more damage than lighter ones. https://www.hagerty.co.uk/articles/opinion/opinion-cars-have-a-weight-problem-and-its-damaging-more-than-the-environment/But actually it's based on axle weight. This is why Semis have many axles, to spread the weight out.But actually it's based on tire weight. This is why Semis have doubled wheels on their axles.But actually it's based on contact pressure. This is why Semis have wider tires than your standard car.
https://youtu.be/kFhKVCaadzE"Deficit" spending on the governmental level isn't the same as a family deficit spending.
No more for theSorry. I corrected it. Here it is again.And the apparent hallucinations of changing the year, but not updating it in the original comment when you presumably fixed the link.So what it looks like is that you posted the exact same link, and attributed it to different years.
And you think they just did it because?
They obviously thought they deserved it, because... technology reduced the need for work hours, perhaps?