You said no group was good enough. Is it possible they had to award somebody and just picked the group that'd look better? Because most of us will instead see the problem in needing a winner at all. If noones qualified, just don't award anyone
Plenty of us also criticized Clinton, we just recognized Trump was that much even worse and we're willing to hold our nose. Because we care about getting our policies and will settle for closer to it, we aren't going to go for whatever merely says theyll fuck over the powerful when we know the policies won't actually hurt them.
We have more than enough evidence of exactly the opposite to dismiss this possibility. All the problems are less extreme in the countries with public healthcare and that don't worship corporations
But the trend is immediately back for Zoomers. That hope dissipates 9nce you realize it's not a new trend and Millennials being decent people is actually just weird
But that ignores the completely other side of how stupid this, in that we know- for a fact- the left is more likely to actually get cost of living down. So why are men believing exactly the opposite?
Tfw when someone says men's issues, and you think they're gonna talk about the suicide gap or education gap or being victims of non-sexual crimes at higher rates; but then they just complain about being lonely
I'm reminded a lot of a discussion I read about people saying they don't want tomvote for Dems because "Dems care too much about identity politics", but "identity politics" just turns out to be code for "let me be transphobic"
Overturn Ford v Dodge