Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)I
Posts
0
Comments
381
Joined
12 mo. ago

  • It's material support for a country under attack from the west and their genocidal puppet, when they could have just as easily refused them.

    Idk why y'all never want to give China props unless they're doing Trotskyist permanent revolution or whatever.

  • If they've already shot down F-35s with inferior/older equipment doesn't that show that they already have the systems capable of effectively defeating F-35s?

    The only thing I see in that article is that it wouldn't be as effective as it could be due to their lack of their own fighters and an AEW&C, not that it wouldn't be effective.

  • No it doesn't. Taiwan is part of China, the PRC rules China.

    If Trump and most Republicans lost the next elections, and this led to a violent split between Democrats and Republicans rather than Trump and the Republicans ceding power, with the Democrats ultimately pushing back the Trumpist insurrection until they fled to Long Island, where they slaughtered most people living there then claimed to rule the entire US from the island.

    Trumps Republicans would not still have claim to the entire US just because he ruled for 8 years (and Republicans far longer), and wouldn't rightfully have claim to Long Island itself. It would be an occupation of American land by a far right nationalist faction, nothing more.

    You only disagree with regards to Taiwan because the west sides with the nationalist occupation in an effort to oppose the communist ruling party of China.

  • The ROCs(Far right nationalists) initial rise is inseparable from the PRC (Communists) as they were working together to Reunify all of China at the beginning.

    After the breaking of this alliance by the ROC, purging the PRC to establish their far right nationalist base, they only lasted about 20 years, before the PRC regained far more support, resorting to the ROC ultimately retreating to the island of Tawain while the PRC continued focus on the original goal of uniting the mainland, which it achieved, and has thus ruled far more of China longer than the ROC ruled the sections they held.

    By no stretch of the imagination can you claim that the ROC has rightful claim over the whole of China.

  • Why would China invade itself?

    Xi: "If you invade Texas I'll bomb the shit out of DC"

    Trump: 😱😱😱

  • It's never been "our republic".

  • Pretends?

  • Comrade, abandon the alcohol, down cigs like a true based revolutionary.

  • It seems to be a play on "horseshoe theory" where libs always place themselves in the middle and leftist and right wingers are on the ends, closer together. With the implication that leftists have "circled back" to facsism.

    There is also "Fishhook theory", Where the same principle is true, but more in line with this "stick theory" where the Fishhook places the far right beside liberalism/centrism.

    In this one, it's a stick, facsism is at the bottom, Dems and Republicans are just barely above that and communism is at the top. The main difference between this and fish hook is that fish hook relies on the curve coming back to make them close, while stick theory says they are just close period.

  • Obama literally built them as and used them as concentration camps wtf are you talking about. They weren't all encompassing resorts that Trump remodeled.

    Trump also claims he's only targeting criminals and human traffickers, the only difference is you rightfully don't believe him, but wrongfully believe the Dems.

    It's not the same as always, it's worse under Trump2 than it was under Biden, or even Trump1. If Kamala won, it would also be worse than Trump 1 or Biden, you just wouldn't care. Just like you didn't care when Biden was as bad as Trump1.

    The point is not that things are always the same, the point is that both parties serve the same donors and core system and will ultimately do what the system demands of them. That's why the Dems started pushing the same "immigration as a national security" issue, they were manufacturing consent.

  • The Democrats literally conceded immigration as a national security issue and changed the debate to who could solve it more efficiently in the 2024 elections.

    Even before they publicly accepted the Republican framing, Obama built the concentration camps Trump was derided for during his first term.

  • You're right, leaving the colonialist project or getting arrested and jailed for a couple months is so much worse than committing genocide then immolating yourself because your brain can't comprehend the suffering you've caused. He really had no choice.

  • I thought it might be interpreted as mean spirited which wasn't the intention and assumed nobody had seen it yet anyway. I'll bring it back just for you!

  • Did you miss the part where the US also revoked their visas? I didn't see it in that specific article, but they were also cancelled from German appearances.

  • It's not the case...it just happens sometimes? It doesn't count when it does happen because it's capitalism? We have to ignore when it happens because if people realized, they would be too distraught?

    I genuinely don't understand what's doing on with this comment.

  • We won't even stop destroying the thing we need to live and breathe in.

  • "For the hard of thinking, Trump is only going after CRIMINAL immigrants. It does not mean he's gonna deport your grandma or send your family to a camp. "

    Inb4 "Bad comparison! Trump is an absolutely unique evil!" Despite the people they would be defending with that statement supporting genocide and criminalizing acts against said genocide.

  • The whole point of all that screaming is to instill the belief that we have already achieved freedom. When you live in the most free, bestest country on earth, you aren't likely to raise a fit.

  • I took it as: The OP is about honking instantly.

    The top of the thread is trying to justify impatiently honking immediately. "I'm impatient and idk why you aren't moving immediately!"

    Hence my response that they could just have a slower reaction time to the light turning.

    So when you say "if the lights been green long enough"

    I reply about how "green long enough" is subjective and the thread is biased towards the an Immediate honk.