Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)I

Internetexplorer

@ Internetexplorer @lemmy.world

Posts
0
Comments
107
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I think that the food industry don't want you to be healthy and smear campaigns like this are attacking this guy

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I'm not and just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I lack critical thinking skills.

    What I said is logical

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I don't know about that but it's funny you focus only on that.

    What about the sleep data, food data, exercise data?

    You're only focusing on a small part of the research. Which makes me think you're buying have this discussion in good faith

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Billionaires normally sell something that the masses want.

    If it's not gained through criminal activities and people actually gave money willingly, then they're providing a service or product millions of people wanted or used.

    Just because people made money doesn't mean they did it in an egregious fashion automatically

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Ha, and now you're attacking me. So you don't really have an argument, you're just slandering people.

    It's pretty telling that many comments on here are just attacking this guy. I wonder if bots are being used to try and smear this guy.

    Fast food companies don't want people to stop eating fast food.

    Does getting healthy offend you?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Because he's trying to do something good. Why are you attacking him so hard?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • That's a generalisation

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • It's not an option though. It's an attack. They're just attacking his personality, or calling him names. That's not opinion, that's just trying to smear the guy.

    They're bad faith arguments.

    Calling him a rich ar*ehole isn't an opinion. It's just being rude.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • He's helping himself by publishing the results for everyone? That doesn't even make sense.

    You're being obtuse and and I question your intentions in have a good faith argument.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • You're just trying to be antagonistic now. It's the data sets. He shows what is beneficial, what's increasing his longevity. It's not that hard to comprehend. What decreases issues, what increase years a live on this planet.

    Why would you attack someone who's trying to help find what helps people live longer?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • No it's the actual data sets

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Anyone and everyone that is interested in longevity.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • It's the opposite of selfish, he's publishing all of this findings to the internet for everyone to see and use.

    It's not pretend, he's actually carrying out methodology, posting results and showing what's effective

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Why are you so angry at him?

    He's literally trying to make people live longer.

    I don't see why you're calling him vulgar names.

    He's trying many things to see what works and what doesn't.

    Your vitriol seems misplaced and I don't understand your aggression towards someone trying to be helpful to society in general. It's bizarre.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I mean he's trying to find the healthiest things to help people live longer.

    I'm not sure about the dick thing. But he's carrying out many experiments with food, sleep habits etc.

    Although you're only focusing on the erection thing. Which seems a small part of the research.

    I don't think he deserves backlash for trying to help people generally

  • A Request to the Fediverse Community

    Jump

  • That's the point. It will be secret companies trying to persuade the general population.

    I'm different companies, maybe out of jurisdiction.

    I just don't know i think we've crossed the Rubicon. It's out the box now.

    Maybe with worldcoin, we can scan retina's and provide proof of humanity.

    Otherwise. I think it's pretty much really hard to control. And people/companies will get some regulations. Might hamper it a bit. But won't stop it. Ie it could be from Russia or China. So it would only work if all cooperated and banned bot accounts. Which seems unlikely

  • A Request to the Fediverse Community

    Jump

  • Prove what? That they're bots, you mean companies would have to just admit it?

    If there were a fine I think it would put some people off, or they would just try harder to hide it.

    The whole point is that bots are hard to discover. If companies don't want to state that they use bots, I don't know how they will know who is using bots.

    It seems like you're just counting on people being honest or some how finding out. And I don't know how they will find out or even if they can unless someone in the company whistle blows

  • A Request to the Fediverse Community

    Jump

  • How would they police it?

    How would anyone know who's a bot?

  • A Request to the Fediverse Community

    Jump

  • It's this the law or something you'd hope would happen?