Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)I
Posts
3
Comments
642
Joined
6 mo. ago

  • I prefer competitive shitting

  • — he said about the pharaoh's mummified remains

  • This is why I use the word 'proliferation,' in the nuclear sense. Though contamination may be more apt... Since the days of SD1, these illegal capabilities have become more and more prevalent in the local image model space. The advent of model merging, mixing, and retraining/finetunes, have caused a significant increase in the proportion of model releases that have been contaminated.

    What you're saying is ultimately true, but it was more true in the early days. Animated, drawn, and CGI content has always been a problem, but photorealistic capability was very limited and rare, often coming from homebrewed proprietary finetunes published on shady forums. Since then, they've become much more prolific. It's estimated that roughly between a fourth and a third of photorealistic SDXL-based NSFW models released on civit.ai during 2025 have some degree of capability. (Speaking purely in a boolean metric.... I don't think anyone has done a study on the perceptual quality of these capability for obvious reasons.)

    Just as LLM benchmark test answers have contaminated open source models, illegal capabilities gained from illegal datasets have also contaminated image models; to the point where there are plenty of well-intentioned authors unknowingly contributing to the problem. There are some who go out of their way to poison models (usually with false association training on specific keywords) but few bother, or even known, to do so.

  • Well another factor is providence: they don't keep around exactly where they got their data from (for several reasons, plausible deniability likely among them). Sometimes on a set level, but almost never on an individual sample. "We found csam somewhere on maybe reddit or imgur or pinterest" is a functionally worthless report

  • Unlikely IMO. Maybe some... But if they scraped social media sites like blogs, Facebook, or Twitter, or their own CDNs, they would end up with dumptrucks full. Ask any one who has to deal with UGC: it pollutes every corner of the net and it's damn near everywhere. The proliferation of local models capable of generating photorealistic materials has only made the situation worse. It was rare to uncover actionable cases before, but the signal to noise ratio is garbage now and it's overwhelming most agencies (who were already underwater previously)

  • uses a raw pointer in C++: Hnnnngh [experiencing the orgasmic gender euphoria of rebellion]

  • Excuse me while I attend my mourning racism fundraiser with grief pyrotechnics. Everyone deals with it differently; I deal with it via fame and money!

  • Sure buddy... Next you're gonna tell me that the Earth revolves around the sun pfft

  • You're probably thinking of things like in-app metadata like message timestamps or internal signal protocol stuff or something... But that's not what I'm referring to.

    For example, Signal and whatsapp can leak device and app activity (which can be surprisingly serious given most mobile AFU vulnerabilities)

    And as an example by comparison: Session et al have better anonymity and transit-metadata obfuscation

    To further explain what i mean: the Katzenpost network is being developed with post-quantum encryption and puts strong emphasis on metadata security... The latter is a significantly more challenging problem than just sending encrypted packets.

    Say the line Bart

  • The metadata alone can give them plenty

  • It has a width of 1/10,000 washing machines

  • Stereotypical .ml user reply to a T

    Literally no one but you even mentioned China

    Everyone's criticising the shitty article and dumb headline; not the tech or where it came from

  • That's a different indie project

  • Wake me up when it becomes a Foss launcher

  • He's more of a saint :p

  • Fuck them. What good is the F-35 if you have to rely on the US anyways?

  • This comes free with the masculinity package you ordered. Welcome, and enjoy!

    Only 2/3rds joking... Some people have a really hard time being direct. Sometimes it's because they don't know or feel confused, but that's more rare than you'd think. Gotta just take the hints. Step back, get some distance, take a breather. If she doesn't approach you later then that's that. If she approaches you and wants to be friends, then you can decide if that's what you want (but if yes: make damn sure you aren't going into it expecting more, otherwise you should just let it go)

    It's okay to make a bold move and shoot your shot, but you gotta back up after that; give them space and control. For example, if she doesn't truly want to be friends and is just saying that because you're present and can't tell you to go away (for whatever reason), then it'll be bad for both of you if you try to make it really work.

  • The victim's gun was in a waistband holster and an ICE agent took it before the other one shot him. The blatant lying is wild

  • I'd recommend Kagi if you don't mind paying. They have optional AI features, but they also have anti-AI features... Not sure how this community feels about Kagi but It works great and also let's you customize results and widgets, so you can disable ai summaries and image result boxes for example, and pin/raise/lower/block domains, or have custom 'lenses' that narrow search criteria: particularly useful for technical / reference searching