Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
363
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yeah. Then Putin took back the role of President using the argument that Medvedev being President allowed Putin to run again despite term limits.

    Medvedev became Prime Minister, then everyone in Parliament resigned all at the exact same time, leaving the President as the only one running the place.

    Putin rewrote the Constitution and that was the end of that.

  • NBC News asked about a possible scenario in which Vice President JD Vance would run for office and then pass the role to Trump. Trump responded that “that’s one” method.

    That isn't a method. At in the sense that Trump obtains the title President. But we've seen during this administration that the President can delegate broad authority to others with zero questions.

    So we could have a President who is still the President in name but has passed 99.9% of their duties to Trump who is an "independent contractor".

    This is quite literally the foundation they're building with Musk.

  • Kids aren't going to work these stupid ass jobs. And if they are working a hotel, they aren't going to give a fuck if some stick up their ass tourist gets upset, they'll just flip the person off and walk out.

    Teenagers aren't going to fucking fill these positions DeSantis is pitching. Migrants work it because they've got a need to do the work. A lot of teenagers work jobs because they'd like a little extra cash, but outside, they give flying fuck. Hell, the biggest fucking reason teens got jobs in the first place to fund their car is falling apart as more teens just skip the whole driving thing or start way later in life driving.

    DeSantis is living in some yesteryear daydream.

  • Apple's AI isn't a letdown. AI is the letdown.

    Actually it's the investors that wanted some gimmick to sell a billion brand new iPhones that's the letdown. AI is just a bunch of bytes that can't do anything unless someone's greed gets it to do something.

    I hate these kinds of articles because they keep making excuses for the actual problem. I mean right there, it was right there in the story and CNN buried the lead.

    The real reason companies are doing this is because Wall Street wants them to. Investors have been salivating for an Apple “super cycle” — a tech upgrade so enticing that consumers will rush to get their hands on the new model.

    It's right there and CNN and many other media keep handing out passes on it blaming something else. Investors are greedy ass bastards and will use literally anything from magic beans to snake oil if it means they can make five extra cents. The investors, the Wall Street bastards are the problem. THEY ARE THE FUCKING LETDOWN. Never forget that.

    I bet my fucking left kidney, that if there's a "victory" over AI and it goes away. Those bastards will be back with some new flashy thing nobody asked for. I bet both my fucking kidneys, that's how sure I am of it. Nobody solves shit, unless they solve that first.

  • cut waste and fraud

    If at any point she actually believed Trump was going to do that, then mission accomplished. Her energy to empower Trump was wasted and she is only a fraud to herself.

    I have very little in any expectation that she will learn from this. She will absolutely believe the next con man and lose again. That whole

    I’m not sure that I would have [voted for Trump], and the way that it’s been done... I’m for balancing the budget, that type of thing, but not, not in this context, it’s just not right

    Is just so devoid of any rational thought that I find it difficult to believe this person is real. And if what she says is indeed the fact, she's too blind, lacking a better appreciation of how government works, or some mixture of both that one could likely bank on her falling for this exact same con several more times in her life.

    There's just no way anyone could have listened to Trump in the run up and bought so blindly what he was pitching. Just a simple basic understanding of the notion that humans lie is enough to have seen past Trump. Truly if this whole story is true, there's not a stopping this lady from more self flagellation. She is in a position that being a rational thinking person would not get themselves into, so there is no rational means to help her escape her level of desire to cause self harm.

  • The President doesn't have authority over Courts like that.

    Congress regulate the scope of the Courts per Article III Section 1 of the Constitution. However, the Courts have the ability to rule any law unconstitutional that changes their authority too much.

    Congress cannot get rid of the supreme court. It must always exist. But they can reduce the size to a single judge.

    Hypothetically speaking, Congress can change the Justice system to be a single court with a single judge. Now they can reduce the size, but they can only impeach judges out of their job. So if they reduced the size to a single judge, they would have to wait until all the other justices died off or impeach the eight they want to get rid of.

    The President only has the power to appoint Judges. And also Executive Orders only apply to the Executive. So EOs don't apply to Congress or the Judicial.

    All that said, nothing stops the President from arresting Judges and throwing them in jail until the President gets his way. No President does that because that would likely lead to a very bad place for the US.

    Of course that only applies to Presidents who give two shits about the country. So to answer your question, normally no. With Trump? I mean it wouldn't surprise me if he started disappearing judges he didn't like.

  • Congress has the power to nullify any and all tariffs with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.

    Congress can then start rescinding those emergency powers acts that let Trump do this if he declares an emergency. Likely that'll need two-thirds vote as well.

    Congress used to have Legislative Veto until it was ruled unconstitutional back in the 80s. Those emergency powers should have been reformed then.

  • Idiot. You literally voted to give the President the ability to call sequestration. It's right there in section 1113 of the fucking continuing resolution YOU voted for.

    Schumer literally voted for this to happen and is now shocked that it is indeed happening. Goddamn, dude. Everyone told you to not give into the orange shit, you gave in anyway.

    Literally this is peak FAFO. What a fucking idiot. THIS is why Democrats are losing.

  • Now my heart is doubtful. The world changes, and all that once was strong now proves unsure. How shall any tower withstand such numbers and such reckless hate?

  • Infrastructure week deux, the Tariff bugaloo.

  • "Wasn't me"

    — Pete Hegseth

    Ah yes, the classic Shaggy defense. What's that shit conservatives say? We're still in the first year.

  • 🙂‍↔️✋ Saving kids

    😁👉 Saving companies

  • An operating system with a poor text editor.

  • He has pent up emotional trauma that he has refused to work through with a therapist like a normal human being.

    Thus he sees inflicting human suffering as a viable alternative to working through those issues. Because that was he can feel better knowing others are worse off.

    That's the dog. Should it be in the race? Nah. But some cucklefucks just refuse to act like normal human beings. Maybe a therapist isn't alpha male enough or some shit? But for one reason or another they just refuse to address their mental trauma like normal people.

  • Their creditors are going to be looking for recompense. So I feel like this is one of those times when we use the answer of "yes".

  • Supposedly the White House Historical Association.

  • We've given an order for a lot. We can't tell you the price,

    Goddamn, that's all we needed to do. Biden orders a shit ton of solar panels and batteries and then just say "nah, I'm not going to tell you the price."

    Any Democrat not on this "I'm not saying" budget plan just needs to GTFO of Congress yesterday. Who needs power of the purse when you can just say "make me" when Congress asks you to follow the law?

  • I'll say it again. These Mennonites are never going to change their stance on vaccines. Most are stuck with beliefs dating back to the early 1700s. Hell the couple in question with the six year old who died speak a broken English + Early 18th Century Low Germanic language.

    These people are beyond back woods. Asking them to change is about as likely as having the sun set in the East. Their daughter dying from a preventable disease isn't some lack of prevention, to them it was the will of God.

    You might as well walk up to a seven year old and ask them to perform triple bypass surgery. These people are unable to understand a vaccine. They lack the quantifiable knowledge to even begin to comprehend a vaccine.

    People might ask how many of their children must die before they vaccinate. The answer is 100% of them. Likely fully explaining vaccines and microbiology to them would likely be seen as human arrogation in God's will. They would rather be wiped from the face of the Earth than to believe they have some sort of say over God's will.

    That is the kind of people we are talking about here. They will unquestionably follow the "laws" of their religion even if it means the painful death of everyone they love. You CAN NOT CHANGE these people. It is impossible.