To a certain extent I agree, but you can buy a book and still commit copyright infringement by copying its contents (for use other than personal use)
If this would go to court, it would depend on whether training an LLM model is more akin to copying or learning. I can see arguments for either interpretation, but I suspect that the law would lean more toward it being copying rather than learning
They're quite common in Belgium (from what I've seen), and I'm seeing them a lot in the Netherlands as well.
To my knowledge, in the case of the Netherlands, people are using a tax-loophole to import them into the country without paying the appropriate vehicle import tax. This is done by importing and registering the vehicle as a company vehicle, but using it as a personal vehicle as well
Importing an American pickup truck this way is still expensive, but not nearly as expensive as if they had to pay that tax.
To my knowledge those are not road legal, since they are too large/heavy to be driven with a regular driver's licenceThe F150 is just shy of the maximum allowed size/weight-limit
I wish there was a good alternative to YouTube. I've been meaning to host a Peertube instance but that process is really not as straightforward as it should be if they want the platform to gain widespread adoption
Google Maps has pretty decent alternatives though:
For simply browsing the map I use OpenStreetMaps on desktop, and Organic Maps on mobile.
For navigation (by car) I used to use Waze (which is also owned by Google), but I've switched back to good ol' TomTom
As for iPhone.. personally I have a Google Pixel which I'm going to keep using till I can't anymore. After that I'm probably switching to Fairphone. They're a European company and their phones are right up my alley
Judging by the increase in F150 trucks on European roads.. yes.
They are not officially sold here but there are ways to import them legally and "affordably".There is a subset of the population that will import these cars regardless of whether they are suitable for the environment.
Not op, but for me the main problem with Authy is that it is owned by an American company.
It's not the worst offender, but any American company is subject to the whims of the current administration. As an example, we're currently seeing how American sanctions lock people out of their Microsoft accounts at the International Court.
I've slowly been moving over my 2FA codes to Aegis.
Visa and Mastercard were under no obligation to give in to this group, yet they did. They are equally culpable in this whole fiasco.
In my honest opinion Wero is not the solution to this specific problem either.They could potentially also unilaterally decide that they won't allow payments for specific types of purchases (Though they are still preferable to relying in American payment providers).
The real solution is proper regulation of payment providers that blocks them from refusing service.
That is for the Eastern Roman Empire, which did obviously have the most legitimate claim to be the "successor" of the legacy of the Roman Empire (because they are a direct lineage of the Roman Empire).
But at that point there had been a thousand years of other empires also claiming to be the continuation of the Roman Empire. To the point where the Eastern Roman Empire is often more commonly referred to as the Byzantine Empire
The fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 is generally more accepted as the fall of the Roman Empire. As the other comments say, that is when the city of Rome was sacked.
Of course, we need to believe and support the unknown random 1 day old user called “telavivgirlexpat” that posted 3 posts all centered around her dual citizenship.
This is rich coming from an 8 day old account with a total of 9 comments
Jesus Christ dude.. What is your fucking problem.You're talking as if they personally strangled babies, even though you have no idea about their actual views and beliefs
I once left my action cam on a table for five minutes unattended. When I was reviewing the footage later that day I was surprised with a lovely video by some people who sat down at that table.
That is not what the eligibility tool for the battery program is telling me.And Google Support told me the same thing when I asked for clarification about how the eligibility is determined.
Edit: The email says Pixel 7a, but that is a mistake on their part. I have a Pixel 6a.
Not OP but it would appear that any phone that is out of warranty will be denied a repair or refund.
I've been emailing back and forth with Google support about this issue for the past two weeks, and thusfar the only information I've gotten is that the reason my phone is denied a repair or refund is because the warranty expired in 2024.
I don't even have information on whether my phone contains a defective battery in the first place. Since the refund eligibility tool doesn't say that, and I haven't received an answer to that question yet from support.
Given that the Pixel 4a came out in 2020 and the Pixel 6a in 2022, with warranties generally lasting 2 years, most phones will be out of warranty.
Edit: This is the most recent response I've received from Google Support.The reason why the terms "eligible" and "impacted" are used like this is because I was trying to figure out the reason for the inconsistencies between the terms on their support page
I am very disappointed with the way Google appears to be handling the issue. They ship their phones with defective batteries, and are now not really doing anything to properly communicate the problem and fix the issue.Instead we get a mandatory update and no real information
To a certain extent I agree, but you can buy a book and still commit copyright infringement by copying its contents (for use other than personal use)
If this would go to court, it would depend on whether training an LLM model is more akin to copying or learning. I can see arguments for either interpretation, but I suspect that the law would lean more toward it being copying rather than learning