If I say “the life support system for the USS Enterprise”,
Unfortunately contact mean that example dose work both ways.
If we say enterprise system for life support. People will also understand.
But voyager system for enterprise could apply either way. To be fitted to enterprise or allow enterprise activity on voyager. Or voyager activity on enterprise. For is just bad language in this context.
Here Microsoft should've used a possessive. Voyagers enterprise support system would be more normal.
Or Windows Linux support system.
But marketing and a history of no other OS matters means Mickey$oft insists on it's own layout. Over language clarity.
Nope. We are required to keep our food standards equal to the EU.
So also on items we sell to ourselves. Not an omission at all. And the very point that brexiters kept arguing. We have always been able to sell to other nations using Thier standards. We are not allowed to accept other standards.
But then so could you and I. But ATM the odds of us being made a gov minister are about the same. At least for me. You may have won a few MP elections I do not know about.
Def Possible. But given, such positions are political in a coalition. Again, the lack of power of vote risking party makes it unlikely.
I'd guess it's more likely under a majority, where he gains a reputation for a specific subject. Under FPTP, coalitions tend to need to appeal to the multi MP parties to survive.
Not to mention the telegraph claimed source. A private security company. Conveniently claiming they have no documentation because their customers (the supermarkets) do not want negative publicity.
But it seems logical that the rules would define contamination, as including any ingredients not listed on the packaging.
That said. Issuing an "Urgent ‘do not eat’ warning ". Seems like an over reaction. Rather than warning folks of the error. Returns will be refunded and listing the real ingredients.
It was workplace harassment. And would also be a issue in the US.
If you actually read what happened. The person that did this was an absolute arsehole.
Filling in a personality test for a 3rd party while she is away. Then announcing your own negative result to all attendies when she arrives. While at an official work event.
Is a clear case of harradement and abuse. The company not responding to this, And the victim feeling the need to resign. Is a valid reason to take it to court.
PS Your response with 0 knowledge of the victim. Make you a bully. Anywhere.
I have one I paid a little more for a year ago. So likely the same things internally.
I use it occatioally on my boat with a mini pc or pi 400.
The only negative is the usb c power port dose tend to get disconnected. And it takes about 15secs to reinitialise.
This really is only an issue when trying to use in unstable ways. On the whole well worth what I paid at the time.
I now have 2 newer non touch screen 18 inch ones. One 4k one 2k at an comparable higher price. I'm happy but the general usb connection loos es and reconnection delays are identical.
I hate facebook messenger, its buggy as hell”, “try signal then”, “no.
If your goal is to rant about these people. Yep you may have an audience. Not me I'm a very old user who just doesn't find much of the modern arguments interesting. Unless they relate to actual changes in how Linux works.
If on the other hand your goal is to change minds. Then taking an in-depth approach to how to use alternatives will both help more. And get you more viewers looking to change.
I'd also subscribe and point friends and family to useful vids.
It dose seems like a curiose choice from Russia. I'm not Scottish but assume russia consider people who understand Gaelic. To trust that language more then English commentator denouncing them.
And historically that is the goal of properganda wars.
It would be very interesting from a data point of view to know how many Gaelic speakers did and now do have faverable views towards the properganda being used.
The rareness of the language may well have more effect on trust?
If the US is not willing or able to force their president to follow their own rules.
What duty dose the UK have.
Him running his own company while president has been against US rules from early on. Him using his political influence to push his own interests is unconstitutional.
Our PM allowing him to. In an attempt to help our own nation build ties. Breaks no UK rules.
We are not responsible for protecting us democracy from itself.
Unfortunately contact mean that example dose work both ways.
If we say enterprise system for life support. People will also understand.
But voyager system for enterprise could apply either way. To be fitted to enterprise or allow enterprise activity on voyager. Or voyager activity on enterprise. For is just bad language in this context.
Here Microsoft should've used a possessive. Voyagers enterprise support system would be more normal.
Or Windows Linux support system.
But marketing and a history of no other OS matters means Mickey$oft insists on it's own layout. Over language clarity.