Moving to a nation you are not a citizen off is not simple. More so when the nation you are a citizen of is consided an agressor to the one you want to visit.
But more to the point. No government can force you to. So even if he could. The UK is required to consider all asylum/refugee claims under his percieved risk at his home nation. It's part of the Geneva convention.
Or you know. More information shared with the public about the needs of certain pets.
Hamsters are the worst off. Most have no idea how big the cage needs to be for them to be unstressed. There already short lives are way shorter and stressed due to pet shops not advising the need a much much larger cage. RSPCA says 1mx50cm or larger. Also if you have a Syrian you likely need a larger wheel.
Yep, My prediction was more the idea of a first try. Cash and run is normally the type of criminal more willing to try with less planning, etc.
To work with machinery needs both the ability to move it in a way cops won't notice. So take minimal organisation. Cops confronted with an assumed ICE agent taking expensive machinery are much more likely to draw their own gun then accept it's a ICE agent.
Stuff small enough to fit in a white van like generators or tools, though. Yep, would just look like immigrants are being removed.
Heck, could even kidnap Musk that way and likely get away with it with a little thought.
I am in no way recommending anyone start kidnapping billionaires to help defund trump. (Nudge nudge).
Nope you should not do that (very obvious unsubtle wink) .
Before, some groups uses this to commit/escape from crime.
Likely to be small scale cash attack on some small cash only but very public business. Dressing like this and confusing local police into inaction. While they bully and cause fear. Someone empties the cash and runs.
He may know it. But it is pretty unlikely the gov has one given its trump uncertainty at play. Not to mention the news released on legal opinion.
But no cabinet member is authorised to declare war or not or future attacks on another nation. Without approval of the whole cabinet. So even if he knows it and one exists.
He is in no way authorised to declare it independent of official channels.
And absolutely any journalist in a position to ask that. Knows full well he cannot answer it.
It is absolutely not reasonable. Unless you are intentionally looking for refusal to answer. Because cabinet policy on attacking a 3rd nation is not and has never been released in such an interview. Such things would be officially announced to parliament first. And be an illegal act of treason for any minister to announce in such a way.
The minister for armed forces dose not have the authority to make the choice. His responsibility is to manage the forces while the cabinet as a whole advices the PM and or parliament on such choices. Depending on the timelines.
So basically. Asking stupid impossible to answer question Then critical about the lack of answer for clicks. Pretty shitty.
Since the 80s all public pool and games areas have become for profit orgs. Often with very questionable business practices.
This has left low income families in urban areas with very limited options to encourage kids to exercise. On a time per pound basis. Games consoles are much cheaper.
Returning to government funded gyms, pitches and courts etc. Added to an effort in schools to introduce children to a wide variety of sports or exercise based on them finding enjoyment rather than meeting some specific gov goal.
Is an infer structure cost that will pay back in multiple way. Not just saving the NHS.
Nothing against video games. But regular exercise should be cheaper or free.
Yeah. Or at least your willingness to take the risk.
It can be fun making a set amount of money last as long as poss. When your recognise the fact you will lose. Given it means (at least in the 90 when I last did it) free drinks and once a free room. My ex and I had a good night for about $200.
As much as I hate the idea the US is a teacher to anyone. Given it's own crappy history. Not that any successful nation really has a right to that claim.
Warning have been on tobacco most of my life. I'm 53 and remember them as a teen ager.
Also remember no one really paying any attention. Banning advertising had the largest effect. As it was clear warning while companies could still advertise made no sense.
Then banning display in stores. Finally banning children born after a set date.
In no way we're the warning the main cause of the drip in use.
Nods saw it on social media so tried it with my little dog.
Was stunned how effective and quick it was.