Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G
Posts
0
Comments
237
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Sir, that was a coconut.

  • There's gold in them pills!

  • He can, but Nf5 blocks it and puts him in checkmate.

  • Kf8, Nf5. I can't think of a way black can stop it no matter what he takes on his turn and I've staring at this longer than I care to admit now.

    Ok, I think the exception is if black does Qxg3, then the second move for white would be Qxh5, checkmate.

  • But do you mean literally everyone or literally everyone?

  • Cameras are pretty good at taking in light and giving a false representation of how you'd experience it if you were actually there. You see it at televised sporting events where it looks like twilight but they have to tell the viewers at home that it's full dark there. I'd imagine at 10pm, his web cam was just doing a much better job seeing than a human eye could.

  • It was very neat and definitely felt more like a pilot with how much it left unresolved. So much potential.

  • Can I do three? Reaper, Dark Matter (2015) and The Lost Room.

  • Not vector enough either.

  • Fools the reporter or the AI tool they didn't bother to check up on?

  • Scandal

    Jump
  • We're hearing it was a sick ostrich.

  • Very courteous of you. That way dad can have the same fap too!

  • My dude, I take your point, but you're writing in properties for the mimic that aren't in the rules, based on your real world perception of how things work. That isn't applicable to the game mechanics. If you really have to have something to wrap your head around to explain the mimic both breathing and being imperceptible while impersonating an object, then model mimic breathing as some form of motionless skin breathing. Just realise that when you go digging for another reason to say why you can see it happening, its your model that is wrong, not the rules.

  • Read the comment. Helps if you understand the rule itself isn't relevant to the consequences for getting it wrong.

  • That's a very good point. Maybe you should read a fucking comment before you reply it. At what point did you see me say anything about the actual details of the rule? That isn't relevant to my comment. We were talking about the faulty argument regarding the consequences of when people inevtiably get it wrong. If you have anything pertinent to add on that point, please comment.

  • Simply not true though. Someone who doesn't want PTSD from turning a human being into a big red crayon is going to make panic maneuvers, which could very well cause a different fatal crash. There are lots of "good" arguments as to why we should be able to ignore traffic signs under certain circumstances, but they all require that humans consistently get it right. Take the extra seconds to stop and make the roads safer for everyone, or if that is so much of an imposition, please just take the bus.

  • Washed

    Jump
  • Yep, can confirm. And in about six hours it will become an ableist slur against the hard of hearing.