I do agree with that, but if you also agree with that then I have no idea why you commented in the first place. You should understand where the other person was coming from because the art style, while similar, is not the same as Minecraft. And since that person was talking about specifically in the context of a DMCA claim he is right that there is literally nothing in that claim that has any grounds (which is why MS withdrew it pretty fast) because if you get into the details nothing shown looks exactly like Minecraft. It looks similar to Minecraft but is still distinct from it.

Even in that image that looks exactly like Minecraft if you get into the details:

• The birch texture is actually different
• The birch model is actually thinner than the Minecraft equivalent
• The pumpkin texture is so different you can clearly see the difference in the image
• The pumpkin model is actually smaller than the Minecraft equivalent
• The "grass" length is different, Minecraft is 1-4 pixels with very jagged jumps while Allumeria is 2-5 pixels with a very consistent 3 pixel length.
• The oak texture is different, the oak model is different
• There's red leaves which I don't believe Minecraft has
• The leaf texture is completely different
• The clouds are different (multiple colors and flat compared to a single color and the latest version of Minecraft are not flat)
• And of course then there are the things that are not in Minecraft but that's beyond what is relevant for DMCA

It's simply a coincidence that the singular image in broad strokes ends up looking like Minecraft. If you understand that I really do not understand why you commented in the first place. Just to make an argument that at a glance that single image looks like Minecraft?