No. Of course not. You jump to extremes.
That's not very cash money.
But it does mean that we shouldn't base our belief in the rule of law on the American system. Foreigners are doing foreigner things all the time. You might not like it but you gotta accept that from time to time. Attention is limited and should be spent wisely.
This is fake news. This is not a party decision yet, but a push from some individuals which created controversy inside of the union and broad outrage in the other parties.
There are virtually no current events in Germany and yelling about Americans being cray cray is not constructive or beneficial to our mental health. They are not our countrymen.
They too can. Their materials value is rather low and the available amount of panels is way too small to make it worthwhile today. That will change in due time.
Limiting your power output may cause more fossils to be burned. You ain't got permits or ability to put up solar everywhere. You act like infrastructure and land is free and then ridicule me.
Not doing anything at all has the lowest emissions. But it is obviously not the best way to curb impact while preserving lives and quality of life.
Your adversity to investments that do pay off would be a great hinderance to society as a whole.
Solar panels can be recycled, take very little materials and manufacturing and are usually not the limiting factor when it comes to transitioning into a low damage economy.
Throwing away great amounts of cheap solar power because you would have to lift a finger to achieve it is not... Great.
To a much lesser extent. Solar panels work a real long time real good. EVs range loss does impact practical use much more than lowering the power output of a solar array.
How tf is the need to pee solved?
Also I thought the confinedness was the point.