Another weirdo who thinks "and that's bad too" is a statement of absolution for predators and those who abet them.
Is that because of No Child Left Behind?
Has Lemmy adopted the "um aksuually" guy Reddit standard for writing analysis and media literacy?
No, person of dubious ability to comprehend what you read, this is NOT what I am saying, this is what you want to believe that I am saying. For some bizarre ass reason.
White knighting? Red-pill accusations misdirect?
Please, feel free to explain your logic and thoughts on this.
So this is because I didn't paint with a broad brush and create a plan of action or are we tarring and feathering ANYONE associated with AI now (which I'm totally on board with, btw, just not something I bother writing in every statement I made)?
The most efficient and effective way to minimize hard, in this case, would be chemical castration of all such abusers everywhere. Anything less is just cosplaying justice.
Should I castigate you for NOT making that statement?
Does that make you a horrible person who supports sex offenders? Don't you feel guilty for NOT including that in EVERY reply or post you make?
See how weird that is?
I find it so odd that because I made a statement about the predatory men who fucking use AI to do this you weirdos think this means that doesn't include Musk and his team who aid and abet them.
Like it's WEIRD that some of you jumped to that conclusion. It's not just you. I've been posting on the internet since the mid 90s and late stage Reddit was the first time I encountered that kind of thing and I'm not sure where it came from. Maybe it was always there and I just never encountered it until then.
But DAMN it is WEIRD.
I mena, there's writing analysis and media literacy, and then there's whatever this wild speculation shit is.
Go to my original post and point to where I said anything about letting anyone off. Actually said it. Not didn't respond the way that you apparently need people to respond to make you comfortable.
You didn't recently come here via Reddit by chance, did you? Because this is absolutely the most Reddit coded response I've seen lately.
When a simple statement gets attacked for not including EVERY possibility for an "um akshually" guy. ::orbital eye roll::
Were you truly not able to deduce that if I made the statement about PREDATORY MEN who used Grok that this included the PREDATORY MEN who enabled that use by Grok as well?
Because "yes that's bad too" is only the opposite of that in YOUR head, buddy.
I'm not dumbing down how I write and I expect a modicum of intelligence and discernment to elicit anything more than derision on my part. Especially accusations like yours so massage your holier-than-thou attitude.
So just let me know how much help you need understanding simple statements of fact next time before you get yourself all hot and bothered.
That goes for the morons who apparently agreed with this guy.
Right, because they pull their own triggers, etc., etc....
Edit: To clarify to make absolutely certain you can't possibly think I'm agreeing with you, I'm not complaining about Grok, although chatbot "AI" are stupid fucking tools for tools, I'm comlaining about the PREDATORS who use chatbots to do sexual deviancy shit.
Not unlike the ammosexuals/ICE agents who fantasize about using their ARs to kill women.
I mean it's real within the context of being used as a term to somehow castigate your enemies for the exact same things you do. And by "you" I mean all governments.
Notice it's usually the West calling Socialist or Muslim states "authoritarian"?
Same with them throwing around "dictator" when that leader was democratically elected.
I'm not gonna debate this because obviously I've struck a nerve with some people, and I find the topic boring, but just wanted to let you know that propaganda reaches deep and some folks are uncomfortable with knowing they licked the boot, even unknowingly.
It's a meaningless term with a non-definition definition. Like that old definition of porn... "I can't tell you what it is but I know it when I see it".
Usually used as a way to paint the enemy as "bad". Except it's almost always a pot/kettle situation.
Every regime of any kind has laws and rules that are flouted by the ruling classes.
Hmm, ok how about "six, seeeeven"?
That more your speed?
LMAO