Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)G
Posts
152
Comments
2035
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Embrace content sorting and filtering algorithms, but on the client side, with optional control by the user.

    You can only filter and sort what was downloaded by the client. So that runs into resource constraints.

    Standardize tags on all content. So many of the different ways different platforms classify or organize content can be implemented as tags, which increases interoperability between them.

    I'm so with you. https://xkcd.com/927/

    Transferable user identity (between instances)

    User identity and authentication as separate service from social network instance

    That's more the ATproto/Bluesky vision.

  • What made it so bad?

  • In principle, the law makes it possible to coerce a monopolist to contract. Alternatively, contract clauses which create or abuse a monopoly may be void.

  • But that was real. It didn't artificially reify stereotypes of women being scared in subway stations at night. The take-away was simply that this stuff is annoying.

    I thought of something: Anorexia. That condition where people, mainly young women, starve themselves to death. This is often claimed to be the result of unrealistic beauty standards in media. Women are also more often diagnosed with phobias. Why aren't we talking more about a possible role for stereotypes here.

    FWIW, I am very skeptical about the role of beauty standards in anorexia. Vague societal expectations seem a poor explanation for something as drastic as starving yourself to death, especially given how most people are overweight. But I am also sure that my behavior would be different in many ways, if I wasn't expected to "man up".

  • Of course. Like you and me, they are more or less free to do as they please.

  • Makes sense. But then, why make the deal?

  • Not sure I'm following this. Why would Reddit not want paying clients?

  • There are legal clients for Reddit from third parties. Building another client cannot be prevented from Reddit.

    If you need Reddit's permission to connect to Reddit, then Reddit can grant or deny permission under the condition that you only use approved clients.

    Adding comments from other social networks would be the only difference that is needed for the initially suggested mixing of social networks. I don’t think that Reddit has the right to prevent that.

    It very much has that right in the EU. First, there's copyright. The US has Fair Use, the EU doesn't. The EU has a database right, a kind of intellectual property which does not exist in the US. There's also contract law, ie what it says in the TOS. In the US, you can't use contract law to override Fair Use. Then there's the GDPR, which is always a tough call. It might be legal enough for most purposes.

  • I was thinking about a scenario where the moderators, or some part of the community, decide to migrate. I should have clarified that.

  • True. It only makes migration easier, but that's still something.

  • That's not quite what the judgment was about. Anyway, I don't understand what point you are trying to make.

  • Yes. The problem is that those are very American solutions. In Europe these ideas are just unacceptable. European values, fundamental values, and all that.

  • A number of things happened in those years. Most relevant might be the energy crisis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970s_energy_crisis

    1971 saw the end of the Bretton Woods System. That was a system of fixed exchange rates between the major western currencies, that facilitated international trade. Governments guaranteed that they would exchange their own currency for US dollars, while the US guaranteed that it would exchange dollars for gold, but only at the request of other countries. In 1971, the US, under Nixon, ended that guarantee. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system

    The Bretton Woods System was created toward the end of WW2 to avoid problems that plagued the world after WW1. It was extremely successful. Some cranks, aka gold bugs, argue for a gold standard. That means that the government should guarantee to sell gold at a certain fixed price. Economically, that is simply insane. These people like to point to 1971. They won't tell you about the Bretton Woods System, though, or how that guarantee was only for foreign governments.

  • You don't need an API. The law says that you need permission.

    Another technological possibility is to scrape a subreddit to migrate the discussions to EG Lemmy. That might actually be legal in the US but certainly not in Europe.

  • The lock-in comes from network effects that cannot be overcome easily.

    That is mainly a legal problem.

    EG you could have a combined Reddit/Lemmy client that fetches messages from both. You create a Lemmy community that complements a Reddit community. The client fetches posts/comments from both and combines them in your interface.

    That's illegal even in the US (case law). In the EU it's hyper-illegal because you go up against copyright, database rights, and GDPR.

    The EU has actually picked up on the importance of interoperability and mandates it in the DSA, but I have no idea how that is supposed to work, given all the other regulations.

  • This looks more like sexism dressed up as science, rather than science.

    If the men really felt that they were in the body of a woman, then I would expect the overwhelming emotion to be gender dysphoria.

    If not, then they answered whatever they felt they should. That's a well-known problem in such studies (eg Social Desirability Bias). Maybe they answered what they felt the interviewer wanted to hear. Or maybe they just regurgitated sexist stereotypes. Imagine putting the avatar in a dirty kitchen and asking: Don't you feel an overwhelming desire to clean?

    But suppose that this is a good "empathy building" exercise. What is the take-away? Say, some years down the road, these men are hiring employees. There are qualified female candidates, but the job requires working at night, or maybe being alone with male clients. Hmm. Benevolent sexism is still sexism.

  • Not quite. Such official documents may be published by the government, but only if provided by law. It doesn't mean that the data may be used by others.

    EU data protection activists are fighting against such transparency rules. I'm thinking of Noyb's lawsuit against the Swedish government, in particular. Sweden has a very strong tradition of transparency.

    That German law was explicitly made to criminalize such lists compiled from public data. If the context suggests that the information is meant to enable illegal harm to the people, then it's criminal to publish the information. In the German understanding, that is fighting Nazis because Nazis create such lists of their enemies.

  • GDPR works like copyright in that regard. Just because someone publishes something, doesn't mean you may re-publish it.

    This data is especially problematic since it is about people's political views. That's defined as sensitive data. By default, it is a violation to even create or store such data at all, even if you kept it private. You could only do that legally if you benefit from specific exceptions.

  • Science Memes @mander.xyz

    ULPT: The Math Department does Not have Ethical Review

  • memes @lemmy.world

    Relax. It's just a game. It doesn't happen in real life.

  • Political Memes @lemmy.world

    JENKINS!!!

  • science @lemmy.world

    Teeth first evolved as sensory tissue in the armored exoskeletons of ancient fish, fossil scans find

    phys.org /news/2025-05-teeth-evolved-sensory-tissue-armored.amp
  • World News @lemmy.world

    Analysis: Clean energy just put China’s CO2 emissions into reverse for first time

    www.carbonbrief.org /analysis-clean-energy-just-put-chinas-co2-emissions-into-reverse-for-first-time/
  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    Can you see it?

  • Microblog Memes @lemmy.world

    why though

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    Saint > Pope

  • Political Memes @lemmy.world

    It does, doesn't it?

  • News @lemmy.world

    List of toys that face disappearing from stores due to tariffs

    www.newsweek.com /list-toys-could-disappear-store-shelves-tariffs-2067404
  • Europe @feddit.org

    The digital countermove to Trump tariffs | America’s mid-air dismantling of the global system of trade represents a one-time chance to compete

    www.ft.com /content/b882f3a7-f8c9-4247-9662-3494eb37c30b
  • News @lemmy.world

    In-House Lawyer Claims Title Insurer Axed Him Over Pro Bono Help

    news.bloomberglaw.com /business-and-practice/in-house-lawyer-claims-title-insurer-axed-him-over-pro-bono-help
  • FOSS - Freie Software @feddit.org

    How the European Union Fell Out of Love with Open-Source Software

    cms.mgt.tum.de /fileadmin/mgt.tum.de/faculty_and_research/mppe/39_Nora_von_Ingersleben-Seip_How_the_European_Union_Fell_Out_Of_Love_With_Open-Source_Software.pdf
  • Technology @lemmy.world

    Kickstarter adds a 'tariff manager' to let creators add surcharges to previously funded projects

    www.engadget.com /big-tech/kickstarter-adds-a-tariff-manager-to-let-creators-add-surcharges-to-previously-funded-projects-170851069.html
  • Political Memes @lemmy.world

    This Cartoon was Rejected 6 Years ago for being Unfair and Alarmist

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    How are Americans preparing for the Trumpist supply shock?

  • politics @lemmy.world

    The courage to be decent

    radleybalko.substack.com /p/the-courage-to-be-decent
  • Political Memes @lemmy.world

    lightsaber noises

  • Microblog Memes @lemmy.world

    Good Work if You Can Get It

  • Political Memes @lemmy.world

    Off by One Error