Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
180
Joined
11 mo. ago

  • Ehrlich, ich lese mir auch nicht jeden Beitrag en detail durch. Ich wünsche mir eine Welt, in der die Überschrift den Text - so gut es halt in drei Worten geht - zusammenfaßt

  • Ich raffs auch nich.

    Man gewinnt halt erstmal via Clickbait, aber langfristig verliert man die Leute die sich seriösen Journalismus wünschen.

  • and that's what they shouldve changed it to in "the people have spoken" fashion.

  • ab und an gibt's auch in der taz polemische Meinungsstückchen. Ist in den letzten Jahrzehnten allerdings erheblich weniger geworden.

  • boah, das Titelbild von "Merkels Werk" ist ja unterste Schublade. Da hat sich wohl jemand gedacht "was kann ich machen das gradso nicht vom StGB erfasst wird"

  • Eh. Die Polizeibudgets sind nicht so geil. CxU redet immer viel, aber macht leider nix weil kost' ja Geld und Wirkung ist nicht sofort sichtbar.

  • Wieso sollte jemand die Massen organisieren. Die dummen finden's toll, und die Schlauen schreiben ne Petition bei Campact. Hab ich wen vergessen?

  • tells you nothing about the presidents' job performance and everything about the media

  • Let me try a different tack.

    You can't elect a party that's anti-bread. Virtually all parties that make it into parliament are pro-bread. You cannot democratically beat bread, the system doesnt allow it.

    Sounds ridiculous, right?

  • … funnily enough, the EU plans the latter, while some car makers act as if it meant the former.

  • imagine defending yourself with what amounts to "no one can prosecute crime in international waters"

  • why would i not be able to do that? you underestimate the amount of political freedoms we have.

  • I am disgusted with your logic chiefly because you're implying that I approve of the current Israeli government. Which I don't. Weirdly enough, people can have more nuanced opinions than "Israel bad" or "Palestinians bad". You should try it some time.

  • sigh.

    crimes of october 7th , let's simplify things and go with "they murdered 1000 people" which is extremely generous. 365 days a year, 77 years, that would make 28 million dead and would've depopulated the whole region. obviously didnt happen.

  • thats bullshit and you know it

  • Fein. Können die Medien denen nicht einfach mal 'nen Mittelfinger zeigen, statt vor jeden Bullshit noch ein Megafon zu halten.

  • Also you cannot just leave NATO. Leaving the EU is hard, but at least still possible. For explanation please look at the elections results of the past decades of any western country.You’d get a whopping 80-95% across the board for pro-NATO parties.

    "You CANNOT just leave NATO ! Because you do not WANT to leave NATO !" is … quite a galaxy-brain take.

    Yes, manufactured consent is unfortunately rather indistinguishable from people having their own opinions, and if any opinion can be "manufactured", you get to circular reasoning like "your not leaving NATO proves that you are actually forbidden from leaving".

  • "besorgter Milliardär"

  • Of course, European states were not neutral during the Cold War. For some weird reason they wanted not to become Russian vassals (and Eastern European countries followed suit as soon as they could).

    But: being aligned with the US does not mean you have to be subservient or bound in any way. As you mentioned, France even left NATO for a time. Vassal states usually cannot do that (see again the Cold War for examples: Poles, Czech and Hungarians were very much not allowed to break free from Moscow).

    We may be fighting over semantics here, but I think this is important. Are you member of a club you can leave anytime? NATO and EU are such clubs. Or are you bound to a pact where you get violently suppressed the moment you want to quit? Warsaw Pact was such a thing.