Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
2
Comments
673
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You are the ones

    Hmm.. i detect a bit of a silly assumption...

  • This is exactly right. Sad that you're downvoted by those who don't know their new testament...

  • to take control of a nascent religion and steer it away from the more radical ideas that some of the other early followers took away from the teachings of Jesus.

    tbh authentic Paul was in many ways more radical that Jesus.. Jesus told people to give to the poor because the end was near, and so did Paul. Jesus chose all male disciples, Paul refers to Phoebe, Prisca, Euodia and Syntyche (all women) as his "fellow workers" or "ministers". Jesus affirmed "for this reason a man will leave his parents and be united with his wife". From Paul we have "there is neither male nor female in Christ Jesus". Jesus followed synagogue traditions (male only), Paul allowed women to pray and prophesy in his churches. Jesus taught the Jews to follow a loving version of the Torah, Paul pushed the utterly radical idea that Jews were freed from the Torah and united with gentiles in "one body".

    (The conservative line taken in later letters attributed to Paul are believed by academic scholars to be from his later school of disciples, not from him himself.)

  • It was communal spirit. Yes you can call that communism if you want. But what most people mean by communism is the state backed variety that you are forced to participate in. And this wasn't that. What happened in the early church was voluntary, as is made quite clear in the passage. The rest of the epistles make it quite clear that private property was ok and the church couldn't force people to share anything (not even a fixed percentage) because all pleas to help the poor are i) voluntary and ii) based on ones conscience as to what the right amount is. That looks a lot more like "moral capitalism" than any kind of communist system.

    I'm an atheist socialist by the way, I'm not saying this to defend Christianity or capitalism in any way.

  • It was the only time it happened and it was voluntary. That's pretty different from most real world communist systems.

  • I mean, Ticketmaster are greedy bastards, that's why they do what they do. But I think a part of a the veneer of respectability they present is based on the truth that you'll never really be able to stop scalpers, so Ticketmaster might as well be the legal scalper of choice. There will always be a blackmarket for popular tickets (so the reasoning goes). Since reselling isn't illegal then it's hard to force eBay and gumtree to disallow it. And there's nothing to stop touts in person. So Ticketmaster says "fine, we'll host the reselling at whatever the bidding goes up to". They get to make some more money on it and disallowing isn't going to much improve things for the average concert goer..

    I think probably one actual solution is to sell tickets linked to your mobile device (somehow). That's probably still vulnerable to being hacked / faked so maybe that's why they haven't done it (aside from them losing out on that resale margin, obvs).

  • How could it actually work though? Without checking ID at the gate you have no idea if the ticketholder is the original or has bought from a scalper?

  • Even the Bible talks about the 'deserving' poor. Dealing with people and power and motivation and rights has been a swamp since the beginning..

  • What are the top signs someone's having a stroke?

  • Oh I see, you mean ban legit reselling?.. could do. no chance of stopping unofficial reselling though (gumtree whatever). It's a terms of service thing not a legal thing. So gumtree, eBay etc are not obliged to take down such things. And of course they would never stop touts doing it in person on approaches to a venue..

  • Without ID on the ticket you don't know it's been resold. All a venue sees is someone presenting a valid QR code (or whatever)

  • make tickets non transferable

    This sounds sensible, but in practice ID checking however many tens of thousands of people on their way into a venue would take forever. (Not to mention now having to deal with the portion of genuine customers who've forgotten to bring Id etc)

  • Reads like someone took an English Lit major, switched to Philosophy, failed both, and is currently at a STEM major college party talking wank..

  • o no

  • It's that after the wash cycle or after the drying? Pretty normal for towels that are heavy with water to be pinned to the drum after a high spin. But if they don't then tumble off during drying (or are physically caught on something) then yeah something's wrong. (You could just try a lower spin cycle)

  • There are plenty of portable second screens for laptops now. But it seems weird you can't just hardwire a second laptop without having to resort to internet based screen sharing solutions.

  • I'm pretty sure in that case the sound alone would kill us..

  • If anything like this was ever done it's more likely it would be independent drones flying ahead of the plane at its 10 and 2 o'clock

  • Really makes me wonder what cybernetics will look like in a hundred, a thousand(!) years. No-one can experience someone else's consciousness. But if an artificial brain extension generated consciousness the same way we do and if it could be swapped between people safely. It might be the first time we have something saying, objectively, it has experienced being both of us in each of our brains and we see "red" the same way. The mind boggles...