Funny you say that. Actually showing empathy and depth of emotions is what has has killed every single relationship with a woman that I've ever had. Society demands we can only be a stoic not allowed to be anything other than a rock for the emotions of others to crash on.
I'll invite you to read my post history and tell me how maga keyed it is
This article is reinforcing my belief that media has conditioned a large amount of women to chase ideals and they just don't know what they want in a partner with the listed conflicting prerequisites from the article. It seems these women pursue what other people tell them is appealing. I also find the comment that men don't reply to chats hilarious as the opposite is my personal experience and friend group experience and this is replicated in many online expiraments. I'd also throw out there as a apparently attractive bi man I've never received one word replies and open scorn and hostility for trying to chat and learn about each other from another man.
Having a partner requires sacrifice from both parties imho.
Russia is already facing severe logistical and manpower issues that cannot be stemmed by importing foreign workers at this point..... But I'm sure the factories can continue to produce munitions with children in them, right?
Can you expound on the later part of your thought? I'm struggling to picture a scenario in which the Kremlin purposefully opens a second front. The purpose of these airspace raids is to saber rattle and make it so Europe beefs up its defenses and is less likely to give equipment to Ukraine and instead use it domestically.
Get out of here with your facts, reason and logic it's not allowed. Don't you understand we have to turn off all the deadly evil nuclear plants and stop them from poisoning the Earth and killing so many more people than all other methods of power combined /s
Fun fact, wind energy kills more people per year than nuclear has in decades.
From my experience they do not. I shit you not their only source of news is tick tock. It's somehow worse than the people who only get their news from Facebook. I have a brother who pretends to understand media literacy and constantly goes on about ground news but they never actually open it and read anything from it as far as I can tell because the only stories I get sent are directly from tick tock.
A large amount of Americans that grew up with firearms in the home learned to shoot at the ages of 5 to 7. The reason those ages are mentioned is because that's the time that an average human is able to hold a pistol unattended and play with it if they don't understand the danger. I never wanted to play with guns because I knew what they were and how they worked my entire life. Most of that training will simply be that if you find a firearm unattended, you are supposed to find an adult to attend that firearm. Explaining the dangers of firearms and that anything pointed at by a firearm will be destroyed. Explaining only goes so far. Seeing on the other hand, the power and destruction that can be wrought leaves a much more lasting impression. The main purpose of all of this is because children educated purely through media have many false ideas about firearms and weapons and damage that they can cause.
Media glorifies guns and gun use and violence. In media people get shot all the time and take no real damage for it. It is important to impress upon children that have easy access to firearms that they are tools and weapons and not toys.
Tldr Children are taught about guns for the same reason kids are taught sex education.
Astrophysics is a hobby. It is not my field but to my understanding it was a Mars ish size object and that's how we ended up with 2/3 of it folded into Earth and 1/3 plus some of Earths mass ejected into space to coalesce into the moon?
Mind you, I'm basing this off of some graphics I've seen and papers I've read years ago. Let me know if any of that sounds incorrect cuz I am not an authority.
Mars is about twice the size of Earth's Moon which makes it half as volumous as earth. With that in mind it's not hard to imagine earth absorbing roughly a moons mass worth of hot angry rock would not increase the ambient temp in the core.
Makes one wonder if the only reason we still have a liquid core is the mass injected deep under the mantle during the massive impact that formed the moon probably significantly heated a lot of the mass.
Well Mr. President, we have three options we can diplomatically ease the tensions. We can Grant the request of the aggrieved party or we can send in the troops
Are you actually this willfully ignorant of what I am saying? Maybe you should read what was written and not what you expected to find.