Skip Navigation

帖子
69
评论
267
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • The market niche today is what it is, that is clear and gives the direction of the company, but its main interest is to make money (something legitimate of course) so if the market situation changes and Twitter or Truth Social go to the bottom they could try to capture that garbage out of pure economic interest.

    In Mastodon something like this could happen in a specific node, by blocking it you avoid losing the entire network. It is an absolute advantage. Mastodon's only problem with Bluesky is Bluesky's marketing department

  • I don't know, it depends on the type of content you are used to seeing and these things, in my language and my interests, Mastodon is enough for me with about 150-200 daily toots from the media and people I follow, not all of them interesting, mind you, but most

  • I left Twitter years ago, but I think you could also block whoever you want, whether people do it more or less is independent of the site, the moderation tools are the same. 3

    What's more, I am 100% sure that if in a few years Bluesky considers it economically beneficial for its shareholders that these tools "have occasional failures" this will happen without a doubt. This is something that if happens in Mastodon, changing the node you are done

  • Yesterday I read on mastodon that leaving Twitter to go to Bluesky is like quitting smoking to start vaping. Changing a centralized place that lives off your data for another one. Right now Bluesky does not have hate speech like Twitter just because it does not suit the current accounts of its shareholders

  • Yesterday I read on mastodon that leaving Twitter to go to Bluesky is like quitting smoking to start vaping. Changing a centralized place that lives off your data for another one. Right now Bluesky does not have hate speech like Twitter just because it does not suit the current accounts of its shareholders

  • After the rise of fascism in Europe, many wondered how such collective madness was possible. Each country had its own motivations, but they all shared the lack of opportunities to prosper materially (that lack of opportunities could be real or perceived, it doesn't matter), that led to desperation and made it easier to buy into the discourse of "someone else is to blame for your ills, attack him and prosperity will return." That's why things like public healthcare were established throughout Europe after the war.

    When fascism rises, blaming the people solves nothing, blaming a system that doesn't care enough for them usually gives better results

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • It may be, but in the case of Spain the party has not moved, it has always had those positions, both economically and socially, not so much perhaps against immigration, as on abortion or religious issues, they have always been the version most radical of the European PP

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • The current system DOES allow it, it's not a system like the American one, what does not allow it's the will of the voters, those on the left would be cool with the idea, but they are not going to vote for it because they are not on the left and those on the right do not like a center party. It's not the system, it's the people.

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • The problem is that considering the Spanish PP as a center is a basic error, it is not fascist in the style of the German ultra-right, but it is more similar to Le Pen or Meloni than to Merkel, it is dominated by the most extreme wing since its foundation.

  • Maybe Eisenhower was still a good president, but I think FDR should be considered one of the greatest leaders of all time, not only in America. Any other will not be up to par

  • Ok thanks

  • As long as NATO exists, the EU will never have a united army.

  • Don't get me wrong, Canada, the UK and others are, and in my opinion should remain, close allies with 100% mutual defense. But for the European Union I would like a fully integrated common army, even more than the current NATO and that would not make sense without at least a partial political union, something that the EU already has and that neither Canada nor the UK want

  • Interesante, de ese autor leí hace años "Historias del Kronen" y no me gustó nada, pero le echaré un vistazo a esa de ¡Pelayo!. ¿no cae en el patrioterismo barato tan propio del tema? por que ya con eso me conformaría.

  • I'm sorry but I think the UK and Canada should not be in that union. Being allies ok, being part of a military union not so much. The European Union must be a strong enough actor and to do so it must have its own aircraft carriers if you understand what I mean.

  • Empiezo yo mismo. Últimamente me he leído los cuatro volúmenes de "odisea espacial" de Arthur C. Clark, ya sabéis "2001:Odisea en el espacio", "2010:Odisea Dos", "2061:Odisea Tres" y "3001:Odisea Final". Los dos primeros me encantaron, merecen muchísimo la pena, los otros dos pues ya no tanto, no los recomendaría la verdad

  • LA app Duolingo NO ES DE AYUDA. ES basura. Pero LA app Mango ES mejor.

    • sobre el género de "app" (si es LA o EL) no estoy seguro de si es una norma "oficial" pero el 99% de la gente usa el femenino con esa palabra. El error entre ser y estar es entendible y ningún hablante nativo tendría problema para entenderte, pero lo correcto en este caso es el verbo ser.