Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
1
Comments
617
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • "Dialectical world-views"

    Capitalists are once again admitting that they're fucking terrified of Marx.

  • What are the benefits of installing a new launcher? Is it just aesthetics?

  • Realistically, there is no difference between being good at business and being good at scamming. Both involve stealing, businessmen just steal from their employees instead of their customers.

  • How is it easy to verify claims in Israel when they lockdown areas, censor their own media, and assassinate journalists and their families who report on Israeli genocide? Israel does not have a more free press than Iran does.

  • Sure, so let's start organizing now and make that "if" smaller.

  • My dude. That's why we have to organize. No one said it would be easy.

  • No consequences from the Epstein-class or their puppet politicians, but there could be consequences from people like you and me if we organize a revolution.

  • Thanks for your answer! I feel like that makes sense on a global scale, but mightn't local and regional scales be more impacted? We already know that the transpiration from forests affects rain patterns, and the forests don't need to be huge either.

    Also, some ecosystems might be particularly vulnerable. For example, redwood trees actually absorb most of their water through their leaves from fog and mist. Could a local humidity harvesting plant potentially pull enough water from the air that the osmotic pressure is reduced below what redwoods need to absorb water? I suspect the answer is actually no for this particular examole, but my point is that powerful technologies like these must be thought through, especially if someone is claiming zero side effects. The time is long past for humanity to learn a little caution with potential climate changing technologies.

  • At mass scale, could taking enough moisture out of the air affect local weather patterns?

  • Personally, I want to help the working class by getting rid of the ruling class and make owning capital a community thing instead of an individual thing.

  • The right-left divide is a fabrication meant to obscure the fact that the actual division is capitalist-socialist. Do you support the owning class, or do you support the working class?

  • Generally declining birthrates and specifically the disappearance of the middle class are almost inevitable in late-stage capitalism (the stage where outward expansion is complete, so capitalists must turn their gaze inward and increase exploitation at home). Although, let's be clear, everyone except the capitalist loses in this scenario, and it will hurt people who are currently in poverty much harder than it will the middle class who are only beginning to drown.

    But there isn't some conspiracy making this happen. It is only the machinery of the system that makes true the statement, "If I don't, someone else will."

    I'm sure many of the educated oligarchs know that this is how the system works. It's why they're all building bunkers. It doesn't need a shadowy cabal in a smoky room, though. Profit inventivizes all.

  • Good point, and I don't really know how LLMs are being rolled out in China. However, given the context of climate change and the impending broader global ecological collapse, I really don't see any reason at all that a tool with such limited usefulness relative to its outsized footprint should be made broadly available. It's like, on a global scale we are already doing basically nothing about how completely fucked we're going to be in the 30-70 years.

  • You can't just take things out of their historical context, or you're not doing dialectics anymore. We live in the reality we live in. However, even if we lived in a communist utopia, the tool's insane resource requirements and impacts on people's health and livelihoods should still make you disdain its use in any context other than research.

  • Ok, but you should hate it though. AI, as implemented by capitalism, is downright detrimental in so so so many ways. Even if we set aside the huge environmental costs, energy and water price hikes in communities near data centers, loss of jobs due to AI, theft of IP, and sloppification of the internet, it is also doing things like convincing my friend with bipolar that they should attempt suicide.

  • It is literally anti-defeatist. I am telling people to take more action to guarantee our democracy. If you still think the government wants to run a fair election this year, you haven't been paying attention. The best way to make sure that doesn't happen is to make sure our grassroots politics are stronger than theirs, so go out and organize!

    Defeatism is acting like we only have to put up with Trump until midterms or at worst next the election cycle, while doing nothing except post on social media.

  • Stop pretending like politicians are going to save us. 95% of them are complicit or are simply making too much money from the status quo to want to change things. We're going to have to actually roll up our sleeves and organize ourselves if we want real change.

  • On the other hand, read Marx's Capital and you will be like, "OK now I understand how politics and the economy work."

  • All of those progresses are despite neoliberalism, not because of it. Neoliberalism is great at one thing only - concentrating wealth in the hands of the already wealthy. If there was no resistance to neoliberalism, we'd already be living in dystopia instead of rapidly approaching it.

  • Progressive Politics @lemmy.world

    California: Vote Socialist 2026!