Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
0
Comments
1294
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Is it toxic to not like a poorly written character? I have absolutely nothing against the actress and wouldn't ever wish harm on an actor/actress just because of a character they portrayed. Are we not allowed to have differing opinions on art?

  • I mean, it's Trek. I'll probably eventually give it a shot. But the stench of Discovery is all over this one.

  • Sure, if it makes you feel better to call me that. I just don't care for the direction Trek went with Discovery. I do like SNW though.

  • From what I've seen this show seems more like Discovery than classic Trek. Having Tilly show up confirms that for me. That's a no thanks from me.

  • Tilly is in this show? Well, I'm glad I never started watching it.

  • I loved that show as a sort of guilty pleasure. The spin off with New York was not as good.

  • And no where near as much capacity. It's a pretty terrible alternative.

  • Being a series of interviews would make sense. That's about an hour each. Still wild to release as an episode and not a playlist.

  • How in the world do they end up with 10 hours after editing it down?

  • Good thing should go up post WW2. The fall at Reagan is correct though.

  • Yeah, I agree with that. Give me a container.

  • They say in their post that they won't host it.

    • Gerrymandering doesn't help with national elections like the presidential election
    • Fake electors is legit, but didn't get used
    • Suspicion isn't evidence
    • ICE wasn't at the polls for 2024 that I'm aware of

    I don't feel the need to continue as your list seems mostly speculative of future elections and not relevant to the 2024 election.

    Edit: I do want to be clear that most of these are very valid concerns for future elections. Just not when discussing Harris losing.

  • Cool, what are the other 29?

  • So, I'm not allowed to add to the conversation for added clarity? What a ridiculous stance to take.

    I stated an opinion thats not completely baseless and you conflated me with MAGAs big lie.

    But it is mostly baseless. Especially when you just make a blanket, they cheated claim. That's exactly what MAGA did. Again something is wrong with you and it isn't me. Good luck with your future endeavors in life.

  • I mean, nothing is 100%.

  • Their own post says

    Nothing conclusive, unfortunately…

  • Then why did my post address the topic you talked about? Again, you seem to have a problem, but it's not with me.

  • Exactly. A candidate that was behind in the polls and prediction markets lost. No conspiracy needed.