I'm going to assume you're looking for a solution in a personal context, not organizational so I won't suggest local group policy.
Instead, I'd recommend removing the msstore source from "Winget". The Microsoft Store uses this source to push updated for installed third party applications. It may not solve the issue entirely, but I find that as Microsoft expands the use of winget as a package manager for Windows (especially Windows 11), the store itself seems to use it for update provisioning.
Both are great, and I think complement eachother nicely. Qobuz mostly focuses on label offered music catalogues, while Bandcamp has always catered to indies. If an artist offers their music through Bandcamp, I still prefer to make my purchases there, but if the artist is signed to a label then it's a good shot Qobuz has it.
Either service offers the music in the highest quality provided, though lossless versions through Qobuz do tend to be priced a few dollars higher than the regular album.
I've settled for Qobuz. Its discovery features are terrible, but it's basically a music storefront with a streaming library. High-quality, had basically my whole library and I can buy albums directly for download.
It works on all of them. It's just prohibitively expensive to acquire one. A better setup is just a raspberry pi configured to act as an intermediary service provider.
People say it because it was a Windows limitation, not a computing limitation. Windows Server had support for more, but for consumers, it wasn't easily doable. I believe there's modern workarounds though. The real limit is how much memory a single application can address at any given time.
Immediate recommendation with KDE: your Windows key and the ~ key pressed together will bring up the ability to set snapping zones for windows. Very helpful tool, especially if you were a fan of "FancyZones" in Windows
A lot of folks will recommend Mint as the first option, since it's pretty straightforward and will feel a lot like older editions of Windows. Personally, I use Fedora Plasma, because it feels like what Windows 11 should have been, and it supports just about everything I've thrown at it. It's got pretty broad support, so it's easy to get into.
I think I'd almost consider it the same as starting with nothing when they began the next phase of construction in 2002. The map then vs now demonstrates that, and mostly follows China's industrial/modern expansion in urban environments in recent memory. I think it's still difficult to comprehend what a massive shift they've had in urban construction since the mid-90s as they've become the economic center for trade and manifacturing in the last couple decades. The transit still can't keep up with demand, even with a subway system so extensive. It's also still a very car-centric urban environment and I imagine now faces many similar civil construction challenges as in North America. It's a good part of why I'm curious to see how things shape up in the coming decades for them and how they overcome those challenges at a scale Canada hopefully never needs to contend with.
We have two LRT lines opening in short order. Both the eglinton crosstown and finch west. They're also actively working to make all the Line 2 stations accessible by way of adding elevators where the designers in the 1960s saw no need for them. Believe it or not, they're aware, but the TTC fights more than just a budget when trying to implement these things.
Besides NIMBYs, there's the rapid expansion of the GTA to consider, which has led to either a redevelopment of land or a requirement for mass transit in places that were developed 20 years ago without consideration for it. As densification occurs, it is both more required, but more logistically complicated. The current municipal gov does genuinely seem interested in fixing this, but doing so is kind of a nightmare without the funding to buy property and redevelop entire civic centers. Add to the fact that the provincial government seems to wage its own war against changes to anything that would affect a car's right of way and the downtown suddenly becomes this unchangeable monolith.
Then there's the bonus factors of Bombardier, the supplier of basically every train for every LRT or Subway line in Canada, the fact that Toronto is actually a collection of smaller municipal regions with their own concerns and challenges, and that they're also still trying to add ATC to all of Line 2 in order to replace the aging trains there. It becomes pretty clear that building out an entirely new transit system under the directive of your federal government with next to unlimited funding is probably a lot easier than reworking a 60 year old subway network that had vastly different aspirations than now.
China runs the benefit of uniform prioritization of these networks, in places that had no previous infrastructure to contend with. They aren't currently splitting a budget between maintaining/retrofitting 60 year old subway lines, stations and cars. I'd be more interested in see if they were able to continue this kind of buildout in 30 years, or if they end up facing a lot of the same logistical challenges.
I don't feel like this is a terribly recent attitude. It's definitely one I've encountered repeatedly over a decade or more of dipping my toes in the pool. It's not incorrect in a lot of circumstances, but it's very difficult to find support when no one wants to help you improve. There's always been a significant degree of ego in Linux user communities.
This would explain why my 11 year old account got banned out of the blue despite me only using it to post videogame screenshots. Cool.