Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)F
Posts
0
Comments
827
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • It's true that I'd prefer it in no games, but it's also less frustrating in straight soulslikes. The problem with HK is that it is a synthesis of metroidvania and soulslikes in the most time-disrespecting ways possible. Really most of my frustrations are with map design, and then they add not getting maps until you find the map guy (in samey environments I can't remember well enough without a map).

    What made me put it down was playing for an hour going through multiple zones without finding either a map guy or a bench somehow then dying. I'm pretty sure just being able to see the map would have been enough to keep me playing.

    For this new fangled soulsvania genre there are numerous better entries that I thoroughly enjoyed. Ender Lilies and Blasphemus are the first 2 that come to mind.

  • A lot of comments tying runbacks to difficulty, when they have nothing to do with each other. I haven't playing silksong but I played about half of the original and uninstalled it, despite the fact it is so many people's favorite metroidvania and metroidvania is one of my favorite genres.

    Not putting checkpoints close to boss fights is not difficulty. It is disrespectful of the player's time, which is a problem hollow Knight was full of.

  • Taking Google at their word for a moment

    And why should we do that?

  • But on a fundamental level, aren’t we just adding an incontrolable step of noise injection in a decent time-tested information flow?

    Yes.

  • Every kid born in the last decade that I'm aware of which they got, got a tablet first. Small sample size though

  • The horrors coming so fast we can't even hold them in our head @.@

  • Abortion? Due process?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Isnt the premise of AI that you can do everything just with natural language, everybody already knows how to talk/write about what they want.

    Yes but also "you have to start using AI now or you'll get left behind". You expect grifters to be consistent?

  • They should be more like the Italian dock workers.

  • Let's make a deal, Tom. Get proportional representation, one of the variations of voting that fixes first past the post, legislate away citizens united, and have fair, publicly funded elections, and you can have the party you want.

  • Neat maybe another well supported browser will be good for the landscape.

    The enterprise software company believes that an AI-enabled browser is needed as it can be "optimized for the SaaS apps where you spend your day", meaning it understands the context of what you are doing in Jira or Google Docs instead of treating every tab the same.

    Oh nvm...

  • There are plenty of times in history when common people have effected change.

  • More like you're peddling pseudointellectual slop. Drawing a conclusion from a single conversation that a point is being proven is silly, for one thing.

    But you also have refused to admit you're making a point even when prompted directly. The logical conclusion of saying "nothing will change the outcome" is "don't try". And of course we aren't changing each others minds in this short conversation. I have deep seated beliefs that the common people can effect change, if only enough of them could wake up, and that part of the puzzle is the manufactured consent framework, as I mentioned - and you denied - then walked back partially with some drivel about human nature.

    Meanwhile you don't seem to stand for anything, except maybe "trying is pointless". Everyone knows positive change is an uphill battle. You're not telling anyone anything new.

  • So just doomerism. Frankly, that's not useful, and all you're doing is helping the powerful by spreading it.

  • I'm not sure what the point is. We should just give up? We should not complain about the consent manufacturing machine? Do you really have nothing better to do than actively argue we should just resign to be chess pieces for the powerful?

  • All of the evil things happening are only inevitable so long as this manufactured resignation/consent engine continues to function.

  • I wish these titles would be more "politicians beholden to lobbyists want you invade your privacy" instead of sounding like it's inevitable

  • It's funny because as a kid I always thought monopoly was bullshit and hated it. I felt vindicated when I finally heard that was the intent as an adult, but as a kid it was supposed to be taken as a lesson to be graceful whether you win or lose