Even that description is vastly overselling it's usefulness. Every time someone says it's like a junior dev I just sigh, because literally the only reason I like junior devs is because they turn into not junior devs. Never once has assigning something to a junior dev made my job easier. The entire goal is to train them to the point they make PRs that I don't have to walk them through reworking.
It remains to be seen whether the advent of “agentic AIs,” designed to autonomously execute a series of tasks, will change the situation.
“Agentic AI is already reshaping the enterprise, and only those that move decisively — redesigning their architecture, teams, and ways of working — will unlock its full value,” the report reads.
"Devs are slower with and don't trust LLM based tools. Surely, letting these tools off the leash will somehow manifest their value instead of exacerbating their problems."
Sure. But a serious negotiation doesn't involve giving up civil rights or empowering the path to fascism. Somehow I don't think Chuck shares my opinion there
Yes you're must likely correct. I was simply pushing back on the other poster talking like ubuntu releases other than lts are unstable/testing releases. They are intended to be stable and usable, which is certainly not the case if they include the core utils replacement as it currently stands.
A test suite from phoronix having issues is certainly enough of a canary in the coalmine that this stuff is not ready for showtime. You have been saying that non-lts ubuntu releases are basically unstable releases but that has never been the intent and is not even what they say.
Every six months between LTS versions, Canonical publishes an interim release of Ubuntu, with 25.04 being the latest example. These are production-quality releases and are supported for 9 months, with sufficient time provided for users to update, but these releases do not receive the long-term commitment of LTS releases.
Key words "production quality". This sure doesn't seem "production quality" to me.
Why would something that hasn't reached sufficient test coverage, or that fails one of the most common test suites around, be put into one of the largest distros around, lts version or not? It's honestly ridiculous
You're literally in a post about an American tv thing. Just don't open the post instead of going in and complaining people are discussing it like a psycho. It's easy trust me.
Some keebs have a function key you can hold that makes part of the right hand keys be a number pad layout.
I have a 60% that I've used enough to confidently say I won't get used to it, but just not having the numpad I got used to easily. You can also have a separate numpad detached from the keeb if you want it out of the way but still need it from time to time.
If it's like the last few trails game, it's not really "you choose whether to play action or turn based" but "play action mode to build up a meter to get an advantage in turn based node when you switch" and you only spend 10 seconds or so in action mode, and also bosses don't even have an action phase.
Even that description is vastly overselling it's usefulness. Every time someone says it's like a junior dev I just sigh, because literally the only reason I like junior devs is because they turn into not junior devs. Never once has assigning something to a junior dev made my job easier. The entire goal is to train them to the point they make PRs that I don't have to walk them through reworking.