I'd rather use some tool bundled with the framework that outputs code that is up to the current standards and patterns than a tool that will pull defunct patterns from it's training data, make shit up, and make mistakes that easily missed by a reviewer glazing over it
- Posts
- 0
- Comments
- 827
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 0
- Comments
- 827
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- JumpRemoved Deleted Locked
Permanently Deleted
- JumpRemoved Deleted Locked
Permanently Deleted
- JumpRemoved Deleted Locked
Permanently Deleted
- JumpRemoved Deleted Locked
Permanently Deleted
- JumpRemoved Deleted Locked
Permanently Deleted
Easier and quicker, but finding subtle errors in what looks like it should be extremely hard to fuck up code because someone used an LLM for it is getting really fucking old already, and I shudder at all the things like that are surely being missed. "It will be reviewed" is obviously not sufficient