Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
0
Comments
1826
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • selfh.st - dockcheck: A CLI Tool for Updating Container Images

    Jump
  • Is used by literal millions. I'm sure if there was a security issue or would be reported.

    Changes for the reason of making changes doesn't make sense either

    Anyway, I use podman now. It had this functionality built in

  • selfh.st - dockcheck: A CLI Tool for Updating Container Images

    Jump
  • What more does it need to do

    It works prefectly

  • And

  • Yeah right now you have to know what's possible and nudge the ai in the right direction to use the correct approach according to you if you want it to do things in an optimized way

  • You are in a way correct. If you keep sending the context of the "conversation" (in the same chat) it will reinforce its previous implementation.

    The way ais remember stuff is that you just give it the entire thread of context together with your new question. It's all just text in text out.

    But once you start a new conversation (meaning you don't give any previous chat history) it's essentially a "new" ai which didn't know anything about your project.

    This will have a new random seed and if you ask that to look for mistakes etc it will happily tell you that the last Implementation was all wrong and here's how to fix it.

    It's like a minecraft world, same seed will get you the same map every time. So with AIs it's the same thing ish. start a new conversation or ask a different model (gpt, Google, Claude etc) and it will do things in a new way.

  • If you need to refractor your program you might aswell start from the beginning

  • I'm just not following the mindset of "get ai to code your whole program" and then have real people maintain it? Sounds counter productive

    I think you need to make your code for an Ai to maintain. Use Static code analysers like SonarQube to ensure that the code is maintainable (cognitive complexity)!and that functions are small and well defined as you write it.

  • Same brother

  • Idk. Maybe you don't want to spend the bandwidth and power on streaming it to a bunch of randoms.

  • For your use case its pretty much identical.

    I prefer the plex interface slightly. But id rather use open source

  • I don't get this argument. Isn't the whole point that the ai will debug and implement small changes too?

  • Just ask the ai to make the change?

  • Decent article but nothing new

  • Is also not controlled or regulated. Which is by design. But it carries massive issues of scams, casino like structures and no protections for the weak

  • Now you're the product even if your paid too

  • Of course. But you have to start somewhere.

  • 90% of users probably just need a glorified table with SUM