Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)E
Posts
15
Comments
432
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Nah im just not a big fan of anyone who simps for putin and the taliban, it's really that simple. If they weren't a bunch of tankie edgelords I'd honestly consider making a hex account, some communities there are neat but not worth having to see all that shit lol

  • Big agree, I really wish people from ml and hex would stop brigading communities they don't like

    Real shit how the fuck are people gonna claim hex is trans friendly after how they acted on 196@blahaj?

  • He lost. Get over it :3

  • Does it feel good putting this much effort into defending Donnie? Do you feel superior to everyone else bc you ignore obvious signs of election fraud and tampering? Or are you under the impression if you start kissing ass now he won't deport or kill you?

  • Didn't you know? If dems called out trump for stealing the election, they'd be no better than him 😇

    /s yall need to get your heads out of your asses, the election was clearly stolen and pretending otherwise won't save you from trump or make you a superior person

  • Keep referring to Muslims and immigrants who want a president that won't kill them as accelerationists, surely this time shaming people will get them on your side

  • Every conservative accusation is a confession. This applies to liberals too apparently. How in the heck are you gonna say I'm strawmanning you while literally calling people accelerationists when they don't claim to be xD fuck off l*beral, from the river to the sea 🇵🇸

  • Considering how much trump and his supporters tried to steal the election last time around, this almost certainly means something, and we'd be idiots to ignore it

  • You didn't read the article did you? Or even the snopes "correction" of it? Pls do that before discounting it as fake, being wilfully ignorant about this does nobody any good

  • "The election wasn't stolen! And if it was then it actually didn't matter and he would've won fairly anyway"

    What is your point here? Why are you so intent on making sure nobody discusses the evidence that trump stole the election? And why are you so intent on trying (and failing) to debunk it?

    Also I 1000000 percent trust an expert on voting machines over a mod of a random lemmy community. You're gonna need more than your opinion on how one state went to debunk all of those bullet ballots my guy

  • Why do you want so badly to let trump get away with cheating? Do you genuinely trust that he won the election fair and square when he straight up tried bribing governors to win the last election? There's more than enough evidence to warrant an investigation, so why oppose it?

  • You're very blatantly just calling people who voted in ways you disagree with accelerationists. You're intentionally misrepresenting them to portray them as evil because if they don't Vote Blue No Matter Who they must be evil and want the world to end. Please get your head out of your ass <3

  • Pointing out super suspicious things about the election is not comparable to denying the results with literally no evidence

  • I'd say the number of bullet ballots is evidence that something is almost certainly up that needs investigating. That's not a normal occurrence

  • "partially debunking" here basically means "correcting numbers that were slightly too large and clarifying the explanation given is a hypothesis". This is still suspicious as heck, especially given all the other ways republican politicians and voters and funders have tried to influence and tamper with the election

  • Who's ready for MKUltra part 2?? :DDDDD

  • Around 1%. The numbers reported here and corrected by Snopes are a lot higher than that

    Edit fixed a typo

  • "misleading" but still way more bullet ballots than there should be. Most of this is admittedly a hypothesis on what exactly the data means/how it happened, but that data can't be ignored just bc he was slightly off

  • I mean opinion pieces are allowed here right? If not I can delete this ig, but if articles written by/with info provided by experts are allowed, then why did it matter what site it's on? Tbh there is a good bit of speculation there, but the bullet ballots are very suspicious and really need to be investigated. Even the lower numbers found by Snopes are still well above normal. This isn't baseless fearmongering, this is a big discrepancy that needs to be checked out imo