Plot twist: Klingon pop is Death Metal.

Does that include ShitLibs who split the anti-Trump vote by voting for Kamala Harris, even though it was obvious she couldn’t win and Gloria La Riva was right there?

It would make sense if it were possible. It isn’t. The entire structure of the party as an organization is designed to ensure that no grassroots movement can ever wrest power away from the powerful.

But I encourage you to try your best. 10 years of busting my ass and becoming a paid campaign staffer was what finally made me see the light. The Third Way Foundation controls access to every single meaningful lever of power. Elected Dems like AOC and Bernie are tolerated because they help keep leftists hopeful, which keeps them voting Blue, which keeps them from ever genuinely organizing to become a threat to the Neoliberal agenda the Dems exist to defend. Their policy proposals are punchlines to the people who actually control the legislative agenda. They will only ever be brought up for an vote occasionally when the deck is stacked solidly against them to “prove” how they’re guaranteed losing moves, despite the fact that Medicare for All polls much better than any politician that opposed it.

And I’ll bet you fell for the bullshit about Jeremy Corbyn being Antisemitic, too, right?

Neoliberal partisan blindness knows no national loyalty.

Lol, his wife and kids are brown, the Nazis will never follow him.

You’re arguing against a stance that no one is making. Nobody is suggesting that no free will implies freedom from consequences

Except for the people in this very thread arguing that exactly, or arguing that evil people can be talked into being good people. Maybe have a chat with them instead.

That’s about the level of intelligent discourse I expect from Blue MAGA. Thanks for helping make my point.

Lol, I’m not anybody’s alt, but it’s good to know your ability to determine what’s going on at the individual scale is as good as your ability to analyze current events.

As opposed to the 20 million innocent people a year dying for capitalist profits?

I’m good with that trolley math.

Trying to discredit free will is giving a pass to people who choose to exploit or abuse others. They absolutely could have done otherwise, they just chose not to.

And your expectations are totally in line with the average dumbfuck in the world today who is incapable of understanding the difference between “everyone does this” and “doing this is ok”.

And I’ve already answered concerns about AI energy consumption in this thread chain,

Not that I could find, including looking through your comment history in case I was missing it.

But unless your “answer” includes some peer reviewed science (like the paper you steadfastly refuse to read since you know it’ll prove you wrong) it’s not an answer so much as an excuse, or maybe even just a vibe.

Sorry, I stopped reading where you revealed yourself to have absolutely no understanding of history or how anything at all works. Right about here:

violent revolution, which might result in some short-term changes but doesn’t change the constitution

A revolution by its very nature implies that the old constitution is done away with. The rest of your tripe is equally suitable for fertilizing crops.

Incremental change never lasts. It’ll be clawed back by the bourgeoisie as soon as the forces that pressured them into making the concessions are removed. Look at the rapid deterioration of labor rights and working conditions that came about within a few years after the USSR fell and western capitalists no longer needed to make sure their workers didn’t look too fondly at Communism.

For real and lasting change, the exploiter class must be ruthlessly suppressed, and the existing power structures destroyed, and a genuine democracy (which the US has never been) instituted in their place.

And you seem to be a bootlicking supporter of genocide, transphobia, and Neoliberal Austerity feeding the rise of Fascism.

Which makes you a multi-millionaire or yet another recipient of the DNC’s biannual “Fell for it again” award. If you’re unsure which, check your bank balance.

And that your strategy of ensuring the status quo never changes by reliably voting for it no matter how terrible it is has been a rousing success.

Unless that’s not what you were trying to do, in which case you can find plenty of clown makeup this time of year in the Spirit Halloween that opened where the jobs used to be in your town.

but you guys are irrelevant.

Then quit blaming us when your shitbag genocide enthusiasts fail to win the quadrennial popularity contest.

If the average person is negatively affected in any way by rules meant to keep pedestrians safe, then the average person is one of those assholes and they aren’t all that few.

All laws are “extremely authoritarian”. I find it a lot more authoritarian that regular, non-ecocoidally-narcissistic people have to cross the street only when it doesn’t inconvenience carholes very much than it would be to take action to stop carholes from speeding.

Ok, but given the massive costs in energy and clean water are borne by all those “intolerable” people, I’m gonna go with they are the ones in the right here. Your arguments sound exactly like the kind of shit Exxon executives said about fossil fuels in the 90s.

When you have a 100% locally hosted AI powered by your private solar or wind array and cooled without pulling any water from a local water table,nyou can go back to smugly deriding the “intolerable” and “smug” people making demands of you, but as long as your slop-slinging is affecting all of us you have to hear about it as a bare minimum consequence.

Nah, they’re right and you’re wrong here.

The thing about long papers is they generally have an abstract right upfront that’ll bottom line all ~5000 pages in a few paragraphs.

Your responses make it obvious that you already know exactly what point they were making and you’re being deliberately obtuse because you don’t like the point being made.

Yeah. You’re not really beating the allegations here.

The fact that you think that’s “receipts” is hilarious, honestly. But just in case this is your first time back on the Internet since making the website that I’m very sure you really are the person who made: Blue MAGA is a perjorative thrown at people who are just as deluded in partisan non-reality as the red hat crowd, but Blue flavored. The Blue MAGA prefers the lies on CNN and MSNBC to the lies on Fox News, but is just as attached to their preferred set of lies as the red variety. Y’know. Like someone who thinks Glen Beck matters all that much in the grand scheme of things.