Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D

DebatableRaccoon

@ DebatableRaccoon @lemmy.ca

帖子
1
评论
435
加入于
3 yr. ago

  • Radarr now suggests not to use uTorrent

    跳过

  • I think it just comes down to habit and wanting to keep things simple. The adage "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" exists for a reason, after all. I never even bothered going as far as to trying block the ads. They suddenly appeared for me one day but would never render, the panels just kept flashing at me. It might have been while looking up a fix - I can't remember - but it was around that time that I also heard about the undisclosed mining issue so I quickly jumped ship. Been happily using qbittorrent ever since and now wouldn't really be able to swap again thanks to finding a proper dark mode theme for it. So few others seem to have it and I have no idea what I'm doing with theme creation.

  • I don't tell you how to live your life

    跳过

  • Any 'love' that wants you to give up your hobby is no love at all.

  • Is FitGirl not accpeting Seeds?

    跳过

  • Which is the "only decent alternative"?

  • Radarr now suggests not to use uTorrent

    跳过

  • I honestly couldn't say how long. I know I was late to the party on knowing what was going on but even I moved on from it a long time ago now.

  • Radarr now suggests not to use uTorrent

    跳过

  • Then enjoy. It just isn't for a lot of people. You have helped as a statistic to the original question though.

  • Radarr now suggests not to use uTorrent

    跳过

  • Took long enough. uTorrent has been cancerous for a long time now.

  • Radarr now suggests not to use uTorrent

    跳过

  • It's not bad but it's pretty bare. A lot of people like their bells and whistles these days.

    Edit: Changed the wording to be less broad for all the "But I..." specials.

  • Kindle app book extraction?

    跳过

  • Is libgen still going? I tried to get on .is a few days ago and have had nothing since. Have they possibly changed domain?

  • Avatar: Seven Havens' Apocalyptic Premise Has Korra Fans Worried Their Hero Is Going to Get Slandered

    跳过

  • You seem to be confused. This "You're literally the first" was your point, not mine. I'm in no way claiming I've never heard someone say they like Korra so you've either confused yourself somehow or you're willfully twisting the conversation.

  • Sooo, where did the blatant Nazism suddenly come from?

    跳过

  • When the Hail Hydra comes out a little too early so they call it a speech impediment.

  • Avatar: Seven Havens' Apocalyptic Premise Has Korra Fans Worried Their Hero Is Going to Get Slandered

    跳过

  • Too late, my friend, the fans are coming for my throat 😂 I guess truth cuts too deep but I suppose this is the show that appeals to a particular mind.

  • Avatar: Seven Havens' Apocalyptic Premise Has Korra Fans Worried Their Hero Is Going to Get Slandered

    跳过

  • Boo hoo, are your fee fees hurt?

    It's always the same with you Korra apologists. Ome negative statement is followed by a tirade.

    That first half refers to the objective problems of Korra while the second is subjective but backed by the first.

    totally unprompted

    Sorry for engaging with the title. And no, not "because me". People just don't want to accept that Korra, both show and character, aren't a good sequel. As a show, not bad but as a sequel it's too wishy-washy. Trying to tie into a story, pissing on it and trying to appeal to a new audience allnat once just leads to a divided audience like this. I don't dislike Korra, I genuinely like some of it, but I can't watch it as a TLA fan because of what it does to the legacy.

    Of all the hills to die on, trying to establish Korra as a net good is a waste of time. As for your attempt to dumb down my comments and make them seem more disjointed, well done, valiant effort. It shows how good an argument is when the go-to is to try tear down the opposition instead of pointing out where it's wrong. Just tells me you have nothing. Have a nice day. I know I will because I'll be spending it away from Lemmy and this wave of Korra rabids.

    Plus, if it wasn't for the blind vitriol, it might become apparent that the initial statement also refers to whatever the writing of the new show decides Korra did after the credits. If her actions caused the end of the world, for example, then it's not slander to call her an idiot.

  • Avatar: Seven Havens' Apocalyptic Premise Has Korra Fans Worried Their Hero Is Going to Get Slandered

    跳过

  • "So many" does not mean "the majority" in any capacity. You seem to be taking this weirdly personally and as for me being the first person you've encountered voice this opinion, you've either somehow avoided the conversation of TLoK online or you're lying to defend your bias which, again, is kinda weird since I don't recall saying the character or the sbow were bad, only "not good". There's still a world of nuance in that range.

  • Avatar: Seven Havens' Apocalyptic Premise Has Korra Fans Worried Their Hero Is Going to Get Slandered

    跳过

  • Cool. It's still not the general consensus though and I don't understand why this is a hill so many choose to die on.

  • Avatar: Seven Havens' Apocalyptic Premise Has Korra Fans Worried Their Hero Is Going to Get Slandered

    跳过

  • It's only slander if it isn't true and Korra wasn't particularly good anyway.

  • New Avatar series announced

    跳过

  • The Netflix show was milking. This actually stands a chance of being decent.

  • 已锁定

    Has anyone tried Riseup VPN?

    跳过

  • While you're using no evidence whatsoever to convince people they're wasting your money. I know which one of these requires less mental gymnastics. What I don't understand is what you're getting out of your little campaign if you expect nothing out of the average internet-goer? Are you one of the Riseup leads looking for suckers to steal the data of? One of their advertising partners who farm that data? You clearly have some kind of incentive for all the bullshit you're spewing. What I gain is making sure the less savvy don't fall for it.

  • 已锁定

    Has anyone tried Riseup VPN?

    跳过

  • liliumstar explained why free VPNs aren't a recommended option, not that they had any personal preference either towards or against Riseup but it's clear you just read what you want to read, whether any of those words are there or not.

    It's also clear that your little advertisement... or war march isn't being received well here. You can take that as some sense of misplaced pride if you want - as said above, you've made it obvious you read what you want - but any of us who know enough about VPNs to know how to identify a good one are also aware we can self-host one (for free) if we wish to and make the choice to pay for a service because we've identified the flaws of a free service.

    It's okay if you want to be some advertiser's statistic that is also your choice and what I expect from the average internet user. The rest of us 'idiots' will keep paying for a service we know we can trust instead of giving our private information to a company that has made it obvious they can't be trusted.

  • 已锁定

    Has anyone tried Riseup VPN?

    跳过

  • So because their blurb is anti-establishment-inclined, we're meant to blindly trust it? What about in 2016 where they willingly gave up user's information because the FBI asked nicely? That doesn't sound like a very secure service to my ears. In fact, it paints a certain picture that Riseup isn't a no-logs service.

    The reason we value a no-logs service so highly is because without logs, a service couldn't snitch on a user even if they wanted to, even if the person(s) behind the company had ethical issues with what one of their users was doing with their service and decided they don't meet the criteria of people who should have access to privacy while using the internet. A no-logs policy allows for an agnostic service. The inherent risk of true privacy on the internet is that someone is going to use it to break the law but does that mean a singular person or entity should have the right to decide whether that person is entitled to privacy? To me, that sounds a lot like the antithesis of what Riseup's goal is. Are you going to keep advertising them knowing that?