My point is, what the law is doesn't matter if the law is not enforced. Good luck fighting a team of lawyers that make more in a minute than you do in a year.
I think Trump's actions are not particularly unique, but he's doing actions that have been previously condemned and in the minority. I'm not so naive as to think that all corruption can be eliminated, but when it's out in the open and the people are getting away with it in the open, that's much worse than what had happened before. Trump is a unique phenomenon in that sense and the sheer number of illegal things he's doing.
We were heading towards something like Trump eventually if you track what monied interests, through the GOP, have been doing since at least when Nixon resigned. I'm sure the GOP were hoping to pick their guy instead of Trump, with Russia's help, taking advantage of what they were setting up.
I get that there have also been corrupt Dems, and there so are, like Nancy Pelosi, but they're not the primary avenue of the oligarchs to enact their agenda. Though they have captured the Dem leadership as well.
But I would welcome a more robust system to root out corruption. And for laws to be applied equally. If that takes out a significant portion of the government, then I think that's fine, as long as it's not some bullshit like what's currently going on.
The bombing is worse, but using signal instead of official communication channels is still really fucking serious. They want to plan and commit war crimes and avoid any responsibility for it by trying to keep it from ever getting under public scrutiny.
I don't see the Democratic leadership making the right moves, they're not going to align themselves with the general public. They keep trying to woo moderate Republicans instead of the huge amount of voters who they could easily get.
I don't consider Libertarians or Greens a real third party, they only come out every four years and only care about fund raising by taking advantage of voter frustration with the Dems and GOP.
I think it's worth a shot, but there's only a year left to go for it. If it can't get the ground swell in a year to get a bunch of candidates ready to get local gov positions, it's unlikely to work by the midterms. And I think the midterms are the best shot to gain ground.
But what do I know? If I was smarter and more knowledgeable, I'd be able to help start it. But I'd certainly help the movement.
No excuse for the DNC, but I think seeking the "moderate Republicans" is a condition of their big donors. Every time the Democrats lose, since Reagan won, they move right because they think they lost because they weren't conservative enough. And despite all polling that suggests otherwise, they keep doing it.
In general, they would get more money and power if they won, so why do they keep shooting themselves in the foot every fucking time? In my mind, even if you factor in that they don't give a shit about the common people and are motivated by money, it only makes sense if they are being manipulated by their big donors to do this stupid shit.
Right. They design the whole rocket, spend years to build the rocket exactly according to the design doc, then the rocket explodes on the launchpad and they have to start all over.
How many transgender athletes are there? Of the very few there are, how many dominate?
You likely don't know, otherwise you'd have no issues at all with them. And if you do know, and you still have a problem, then your issue is one of bigotry and not protection.
For reference, there have been more female athletes sexually assaulted by coaches and other male identifying staff by a large margin than there have been medal placing transgender athletes. I'm sure you can find a few examples of transgender athletes placing in the top three, but unless you're completely stupid, then you know that's fallacious thinking to ignore the whole data set by cherry picking non representative samples.
You're basically for something that's not a problem in any measurable way, but not against things that are actually harming women. And I get it, you can be against both, but that doesn't change that transgender athletes are not a problem in any rational, real way. But to enforce a non-transgender policy will necessarily require putting women through very invasive examinations and tests that open them to even more sexual assault.
Now imagine being such a piece of shit against someone you've never met, who's not hurting anyone, that you don't want them to play sports against their peers. And then being so idiotic and emotionally irrational to say that they are not the victim of your idiotic bigotry.
I always thought it was because he's fat, so he leans forward to hide his huge belly. Works pretty well from the front where most pictures of him are taken.
I know it's that stupid. But it doesn't matter that it's stupid. They're going to use it when they see fit and they have captured the whole legal system to use at their discretion to enact it no matter how stupid it is.
They're fascists, they're only going to enforce it when they want to hurt someone they don't like or when it benefits them. They don't give a shit about precedence or conviction or morality or anything other than what serves them in the moment. They have captured the courts, and both houses, and the presidency. Consistency or hypocrisy don't matter to them. They'll use whatever justification works in the moment and turn on a dime if it serves them.
My point is, what the law is doesn't matter if the law is not enforced. Good luck fighting a team of lawyers that make more in a minute than you do in a year.