Skip Navigation

Posts
70
Comments
1132
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Yes, exactly. That's why I'm concerned about the system in my home country. However, I find it incomprehensible how anyone who is a US citizen can still believe in the illusion that the US is a democracy. It has been an oligarchy for at least thirty years and, to be honest, always has been - that is to say, a nation that is actually ruled by a few instead of by its people. This was the case long before the first term of the current, unusually criminal president. He has changed little in terms of the facts, but is simply particularly unscrupulous, thus making it obvious that the US system has long since ceased to have anything to do with democracy.

    I'm sorry to have to say it so bluntly, but your comments suggests that, like many Americans, you are not really aware of what a democracy is. If there were such awareness in the US, it would not be possible, for example, for there to be no statutory health insurance, no protective rights for workers, and so on.

  • Is that really what democracy is about, or is that just what billionaires have made of it?

    I ask because you are applying a monetary standard instead of what the citizens want. This leads me to suspect that you are a US citizen, as this system no longer has much to do with democracy at all since the fewer than twenty people who make up the Supreme Court, the highest judicial authority in the US system, ruled that there is no upper limit on "campaign donations," that they do not have to be disclosed, and that "political consultants," such as Musk, do not need confirmation by the people to be entrusted with powers that in any other democracy worthy of the name would naturally require the consent of the citizens.

    Oh, and one more thing: the Supreme Court has also ruled that the US president is de facto above the law – which is also incompatible with any democratic constitution.

  • Immer gern. Ich bin inzwischen allerdings leider schon soweit, dass ich mir diese Vorgänge nicht mehr mit Inkompetenz erklären kann. Vielleicht ist es etwas verschwörungstheoretisch, aber das bitte ich zu entschuldigen - ich fürchte, ich habe inzwischen jeden Glauben an die Politik verloren.

    Edit: Die Ansage der Grünen lautete allerdings tatsächlich so - das ist keine Verschwörungstheorie, sondern auch hierzulande die Realität.

  • Die haarsträubende Ausrede war, dass der Naturpark Schwarzwald um einige, wenige Kilometer erweitert werden soll - das habe man der CDU wacker abgerungen, hieß es ... im Austausch dafür, dass grundlose und verfassungswidrige Massenüberwachung auch in Deutschland zur Realität wird und ebenso dafür, dass kein Ermittlungsverfahren gegen jene korrupten CDU-US-Assets eingeleitet wird, die bereits zuvor den besagten Palantir-Deal auf eigene Faust und unter Umgehung jedweder demokratischer Kontrollmechanismen ganz einfach abgeschlossen haben. So haben die Grünen - natürlich unter den allerschlimmsten Bauchschmerzen - die Sache ernsthaft noch als so etwas wie einen politischen Deal verkaufen wollen. Absurder könnte es wirklich nicht mehr sein, aber irgendwie mussten sie ja begründen, warum sie bereit sind, sogar noch die sensibelsten Daten direkt an offene Faschisten weiterzugeben - an den Demokratiefeind Peter Thiel ebenso wie an den organgenen Kinderschänder im weißen Haus.

  • In BaWü hat die Landesregierung entgegen eine Petition mit mehr als 13.000 Unterschriften (wurde frühzeitig beendet, weil unsere verehrten Politiker lieber schnell abgestimmt haben, bevor noch mehr Gegenstimmen zusammenkommen) sogar eigens das Polizeigesetz geändert, um dem bereits zuvor völlig widerrechtlich mit Palantir geschlossenen Vertrag rückwirkend noch irgendwie zumindest den Anschein von Legalität zu geben. Damit ist der Einsatz der Palantir-Massenüberwachungsanwendung "Gotham" hier beschlossene Sache, obwohl m.E. verfassungswidrig (s. Recht auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung).

    Hier findest du auf der Seite des Landtags eine PDF-Datei mit den Namen aller Abgeordneten, die dafür gestimmt und damit die Bürger verraten haben - neben den üblichen Verdächtigen wie CDU und AfD haben auch die Grünen so gut wie geschlossen dafür gestimmt, was zeigt, dass auch diese Partei trotz ihrer hehren Sprüche offensichtlich so sehr vom US-Lobbyismus unterwandert ist, dass sie eklatant entgegen die Interessen der Bürger handelt.

    Es ist wirklich zum Kotzen.

  • Indeed, in the US, prisoners are exploited as slave labor, with private companies essentially running the prisons and earning billions in the process.

    On the other hand, the super-rich get away with the most heinous crimes imaginable.

  • I would say that it wasn't us, the ordinary people, who created this terrible world, but we definitely allowed the worst among us to do so - and we even rewarded them for it, so that this monstrous world is now ruled by the most ruthless, like a monarchy that was believed to have been overcome. Apparently, civilizational progress is not bound to the passage of time, as I strongly suspect that we are regressing civilizational: back to absolutism with its degenerate rulers who give free rein to their perverse desires - and they can do so, because they are at the top of a society they exploit with impunity.

  • Has the guy finally realized he's still a visionary? After all, you're usually on the right track if you do the exact opposite of what this jerk says. So maybe that's the best approach here.

    I'm not a fan of this proposal, because it can only be implemented with age verification, which we all know what that entails, but if he's against it, you almost have to be for it.

    Nah, better not. The right thing to do is ignore all his pronouncements and make sure everyone finally leaves his goddamn self-aggrandizing platform - and that he spends his twilight years deservedly in prison.

    In any case: Fuck this pedophile piece of shit.

  • Yes, unfortunately that is true, except that these "legal entities" cannot be held liable for their crimes in the same way as humans. Therefore, the people who control these companies cannot be held liable for their crimes.

    This is a legal trick that illustrates that the law has nothing to do with justice, while ensuring that billionaires are "legally" above the law that applies to everyone who is not a billionaire.

  • It's truly unbelievable that legacy media headlines still portray the US regime's statements as even remotely credible...

  • Why is non-news like this still so popular in the US when there are so many more important issues, such as the fact that the government is breaking its own laws by continuing to prevent the publication of the Epstein files, that it is executing people in public with no trial and no reason whatsoever, that it is continuously breaking existing laws, that it is betraying and extorting long standing allies, that it is shamelessly enriching itself in a way that is unprecedented even in the history of the US, which is certainly famous for this ... the list goes on and on, but still, non-news about Erika Kirk gets upvotes???? Why??? Because the US users need someone to hate instead of themselves?

    Even people here on lemmy don't seem to realize how attention is being siphoned off - because they post stuff about a completely irrelevant person and thus do exactly what the US regime, which is promoting this person, wants them to do.

    It really couldn't be any more stupid.

    Why don't you just focus on the president and his organized crime operation? Why do you allow yourselves to get distracted by his bullshit? Why do you even help with this orange child molester out by doing his very bidding!

    Just do the world a favor and participate in the nationwide strike planned for tomorrow.

  • Rule of law, huh?

    It's almost like something straight out of the Nazis' playbook back in Germany: seizing power by abusing the law. Hitler first made use of the so‑called "Reichstag Fire Decree" to undermine fundamental rights and launch a campaign of terror - using violence, mass arrests and intimidation to eliminate political opponents; at least formally, these measures were covered by law.

    Subsequently, these and all other heinous crimes committed by the Nazis were rapidly enshrined in legal form, backed by police force and intimidation - for example the "Enabling Act," which stripped parliament of its powers and allowed the cabinet (in practice controlled by Hitler) to enact laws, even contrary to the constitution.

    Overall, it was a takeover that used and even created the appearance of constitutionality, in which the Nazis interpreted and applied the law at their own discretion and enforced it with violence and intimidation. The rest is history.

    When I look at the US news since January last year, it all seems very familiar - with a rather insignificant difference being that instead of the Reichstag fire, another staged "emergency," namely illegal immigration, is being used as a pretext to undermine civil rights...

  • Exactly, and on top of that, there's always this shady Irish leprechaun at the end trying to peddle you a pot of gold ...

  • The thing is: it is no longer necessary to burn fossil fuels for transportation or energy production. The idea that this is still necessary is a narrative fueled by the money of a few unscrupulous people, which is what this random post is about. It is a lie that will lead us all to ruin.

    We simply cannot continue the status quo. This conclusion is not just my opinion, but a proven fact that, to my knowledge, no reputable scientist would dispute.

  • Unfortunately, the Eppstein case proves that not even this is their downfall.

  • Mycology @mander.xyz

    Mushroom in the Wild Playing Keyboard

  • interestingasfuck @lemmy.world

    Mushroom in the Wild Playing Keyboard

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    What plot would a political thriller written in 50 years' time have?

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    The triumph of AI marks the end of the information age.

  • Unpopular Opinion @lemmy.world

    The internet makes rationality impossible, even though it theoretically provides access to a large portion of human knowledge

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    What concrete steps can be taken to combat misinformation on social media? This problem is hardly an issue on this platform, but it certainly is elsewhere. Do you have any ideas or suggestions?

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    What is your opinion on national pride / patriotism?

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Who will be the villains in future Hollywood movies?

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Have you ever had fruitful discussions cut short because OP deleted the post? If so, is this a fundamental problem or just an annoyance?

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Why is Lemmy so US-centric? The largest instances are in Europe, aren't they? So why does it have to be US news trolling as if it were Reddit?

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    Lemmy is ... ahhrrr, c'mon ... WTF? ... the door! ... who the hell would ... ? ... where is this darn towel ... AHHH, FUUU ... hnnnrrghhh ...

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    If you turn the Chicago Bulls logo upside down, it looks like a robot is doing a crab.

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Is social media an appropriate term to describe the logic of these applications? Or is it a term that obscures the logic of these applications?

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Considering all the technological advances humanity has made in the last 50 years, has humanity evolved in terms of civilization, stagnated, or regressed?

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    The end of humanity will come about through people's apathy.

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    In your opinion, what is the purpose of a legal system? And do you think that the legal system in the country you live in fulfills this purpose?

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    One major issue with social media is that it operates on a first come, first served basis. This essentially rules out the possibility of well-considered, well-researched content being successful.

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Why should I continue to financially support the development of Lemmy when the developers operate .ml, an instance that is a prime example of arbitrary censorship?

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    The most significant factor standing in the way of human progress is people themselves.

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    How can children be introduced to digital technology and the internet in a playful way? At what age is this appropriate? And how can this be done without exposing children to all the negative aspects?