

If the brainrot hasn’t been “emprically proven”, I’ve felt it from experience. Writing, coding, and other matters expressed in text often only improve with practice. At work, when I go a long stretch of time working on my projects by just conversing with a chatbot because I have something I can’t be assed to figure out that day, I find my skills degrade quite naturally for the next couple days after. It’s a normal phenomena outside of AI usage; contact books made people not have to remember phone numbers, GPS lets people not know how to navigate a place independently, etc. It’s honestly really reasonable that substituting one’s own judgement or skills for an LLM would naturally lead to a degradation of one’s own judgement or skills.
























That is essentially true; but I like to learn C.
Liu Shengyu recently put out a good article that’s done waves imho, where he describes his work as now becoming more like a mech pilot for an AI to program the actual work. Of course, actually knowing what we’re doing has marked benefits for the quality and speed of our work as mech pilots, but we’re still kind of being trained to be “mech pilots” when we only program via an AI
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/zk0KxuLzhmMJ4LPYW_OHMA (Translate it if you’d like)