Wow...this was really enlightening. I really like this approach because I agree: I don't know what will work. We need to make room for people to resist in a way that is comfortable for them. I may be more "radical" than some.
We'll have to see what works but in the mean time, I will do my best not to split. It will be hard not to critique but I see the need to not do that.
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
I've been rocking Waterfox since the whole MPL/ToS enshittification. Waterfox has kept most of the AI shit out. If I had to guess, those parts require ToS acceptance and since Waterfox can't legally grant usage to Mozilla's servers, they can't be included.
I'd love to see a true FOSS alternative browser hit mainstream and would gladly give LadyBird a try once it's usable.
Well, also protection from prosecution punishment.
He was successfully convicted. He didn't even get a slap on the wrist. At best, he got a paper cut from the judge throwing the sentencing papers at him.
The second amendment loving NRA patriots are furiously masturbating to the fascist takeover of the federal government. Do not for one second believe that they believe in the second amendment to overthrow a Republican president. They absolutely would if a Democrat was president.
The biggest issue gun-owning liberals have is that they lack organization whereas the conservatives have it in spades. We desperately need progressives to begin banding together and laying out a plan on what happens when Trump's troops march toward Maryland, a liberal state.
We are quickly reaching the point where we need people who are not only willing to fight for our country, but are willing to die for it as well. I suspect many of us here are willing to do the former, but not many of us are willing to do the latter.
The accommodation the employer needs to make is to put her in a position where her religious values would not interfere with her work.
But given that she likely took the job for the very purpose of forcing her religious values onto her work, she should have a legal obligation to STFU and just do her fucking job. This honestly would be no different if a Buddhist refused to issue conceal carry permits because they believe in non-violence.
If you disagree with the law, you lobby to change the law. Not fucking be the arbiter of the law in your administrative role.
I can't remember the name of the philosopher that pretty much said that because existing is so toxic to our environment, we should stop existing (i.e. stop having children, not commit genocide to be clear).
I know this isn't remotely the point but I think "pedophile rapist" hits better. Your way makes it sound like he is a rapist who is also a pedophile. Which, don't get me wrong, he is.
But "pedophile rapist" describes the fact that he rapes children.
My unpopular take: he shouldn't. Maybe for congress, but honestly his skills and voice is better as a commentator.
Jon has an uncanny ability to speak truth to power. We don't have many of those right now. If I were president, I might ask him to join an advisory board, similar to what Kal Penn did under Obama.
What we need are more young and progressive people running for office. Everywhere. Especially at the local level.
The number of religious Karens running unopposed is too damn high especially at the school board level.
I don't log into my Lemmynsfw account much these days. But I know that a lot of "copy" subreddits were made in the days after the API shutoff. So it very well could be a community already but I'm too lazy to look.
It went nowhere because he wasn't going to be the first judge to give a former and possibly future president any consequences.