Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
帖子
3
评论
380
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • There are 4 candidates including a candidate who helped fight the draft of hundreds of Russians and is anti war

  • You are NOT allowed to publicly denigrate books calling for murder and genocide

    The UN, for some reason

    This criticism also applies to other religious books -- the brainworm, religion, doesn't deserve any sort of respect

  • The Quran is a symbol of hate and oppression for a lot of people (ex-muslims, some LGBTQ people). It's also true of other religious books, for which I also support public denigration of all kind

  • It's not like he's been a genocidal maniac for decades and still got elected multiple times already

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • You are prompted what app to use when trying to do something, yes. If you click a link in an app for the first time, it will ask you what browser to open it into

  • No

  • He compared the people from the region of Caucasus to cockroaches who should be shot and had skinhead and neonazi affiliations.He also supported the invasion of Georgia in 2008, comparing Georgians to rodents. He regularly attended marches of a racist which the slogan is "Russia for ethnic russians", posted a video where he called for deportations of immigrants...

    It's not a case of exaggeration, he was anti Putin because he wanted a racist in power.

  • You're only saying that because you know what Putin is like in power, with his racist remarks and Nazi affiliations you don't even know how worse it could have been with Navalny

  • How is a Nazi a "step in the right direction"? There is a lot of opposition to Putin that's worth supporting, Nazism isn't one of them

  • That's exactly the word you're looking for

  • Reality doesn't match your headcanon

  • That's not the argument I'm making. What I'm saying is that if you only take the raw numbers for a given event into account, and don't consider the population of the event, then you can make any event affecting a large population look like an urgent affair when it's not so urgent

    Human driven cars should be replaced with automation (or even better, automated public transportation) as soon as it's viable. It's not yet, so we should not rush corporations to put their unsafe vehicles on the street. Because then the only thing you'll rush is transforming human driver fatalities into robotic driver fatalities, and you never know how worse things can get

    Edit: Wording

  • The fact that a thing most people do and some for hours daily has a large effect shouldn't be surprising

  • Just adware and spyware

  • 1 - 1 = 1

  • Just checked it, it doesn't seem to be the case

    When you save website passwords, the Primary Password feature encrypts them before storing them on your computer

  • How about when using a primary password?

  • If it's a news agency they could sign it. Great.

    But then it hinders the denouncing of police violence, whistleblowing, and allows corporations to sign their claims while what regular people record will be assumed to be false

    Edit: reporting can also be done as a second hand account, reposting videos/photos already in circulation, meaning that either a news company will sign those second hand recordings at the risk of validating AI content, or only their own corporate recordings will be used.

    No one wins in any case

  • Get a pair of Viture glasses then, it's about $500