Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C

Clent

@ Clent @lemmy.world

Posts
2
Comments
412
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Might need a signature stamp!

    Jump

  • Has he actually said he'd pardon anyone but himself?

    I don't anticipate him doing anything that doesn't benefit himself based on his previous behavior.

  • Whelp

    Jump

  • This is the proletariat view of the world.

    For anyone who isn't just a common wage worker and is aware of how markets work, it is very definitely not the case.

    A cog in the machine cannot perceive the machine's changing output.

  • Too soon?

    Jump

  • Your risk is being bombed went up and you're gloating. That's precious.

  • The most powerful brain on Twitter

    Jump

  • I think that's a different discussion.m. We can make excuses all day for how people end up with extreme views. It doesn't change anything. The reason it occurs is part of human nature, a weakness that one has to choose to overcome on a daily basis or not. Choosing wrong too often and there might be no way back.

    I find this most evident in people who suddenly shift right when they end up in some sex scandal, they move towards the group that is most forgiving of such events and lose themselves in the shift. Russel Brand and Musk are two examples.

    Knowledge seeking for the sake of knowledge seeking is something totally different. It requires accepting one knows nothing and despite all the knowledge gather now knows less. It requires a humility that can be uncomfortable.

    Few end up adding significant new knowledge. Those who do maintain a humbleness as the recognize the efforts who came before them.

    Those who pretend become exploiters, it takes little effort to reveal their search was only ever for loopholes. Those people are another form of extremist.

  • The most powerful brain on Twitter

    Jump

  • Stupid people don't know how stupid they are. They reject the very notion. It's how one stays stupid in a world with all the world's knowledge at our fingertips.

    Turns out access to knowledge was not a threat to the leaders in history. The very idea they were concerns may be oversold.

  • US restaurant chains see profits collapse as Israel boycott bites

    Jump

  • How are we certain this is a boycott vs people realizing they are being gouged for shit food?

  • Trump fumes over mic issues at Milwaukee rally: ‘Do you want to see me knock the hell out of people backstage?’

    Jump

  • The only way he could knock someone out is by sitting his fat stinky ass on their chest for a couple minutes.

  • Why is it not grave robbery to take artefacts from ancient graves and put them in a museum?

    Jump

  • Being born in the same town means there is a high chance of it being a relative of the girl and her grandmother.

  • A New Insult Reminds Puerto Ricans of How Trump Treated Them | As president, Donald Trump fought bitterly with Puerto Rican officials, ridiculed them and resisted sending aid to the territory

    Jump

  • Also important that one already hates themselves too.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Unionize

  • Fucking weak, get on our level.

    Jump

  • A few of the dumbest people I know are leftists, the rest are right wing zealots.

  • What are your AI use cases?

    Jump

  • Currently, mainly just cooking.

    In the future, I'm hoping to leverage it to create video content. I've actually been disappointed in its usefulness for writing sci-fi, it tends to want to argue. But based on the surreal images that it can created I am hoping that can be translated into creating 3D scenes that can be used to extract video.

  • Two-Party System

    Jump

  • a third party (who won't win but maybe doesn't love genocide).

    That "maybe" is doing all the work here.

    Maybe that third party candidate orgasms to genocide.

    But main point is you admit they won't win so what you're, which you feel alleviates you from being culpable. This entire process is occurring in your imagination, all based on the fantasy of a maybe.

    You cross the line when you attack others for making a choice among the valid options. Getting upset that people don't go along with your story is weird and antisocial.

  • Two-Party System

    Jump

  • The person who set up the problem isn't on the ballot.

    We're voting for the person at the lever.

    Hatred isn't going to change anything. One could argue that hatred is how people end up in the tracks.

  • Bottom right

    Jump

  • I heard him say he murdered his friend.

    Pity there is no third party to investigate my claim. We'll just have to string him up ourselves.

    I call dibs on his shoes.

  • Two-Party System

    Jump

  • Classic trolley problem and you have failed it.

    You want to hate the guy for pulling the lever that leads to fewer deaths at the expense of allowing the one who will ignore the lever and allow for the most death.

  • Apple Working on New Magic Mouse 2, Magic Trackpad 2 and Magic Keyboard

    Jump

  • When I first got my Magic Mouse back around 2018, I swear I could use it while it charged. At the very least the touch surface still functioned but I vaguely recall being able to use the edge of my desk to try it to track. Somewhere along the way they disabled it from connecting while charging.

  • The GOP: Empowering rapists to choose the mother of their children

    Jump

  • That's really missing the point.

    If a man rapes a woman and a child is born, the courts will give him shared custody. Choose to give the child up and the racist can block it and get full custody.

    There is a depth there that has no legal equivalent where the victim is punished. Closest I can think of is if a burglar breaks in, you have to give them a room in your house for the rest of your life or you can just give them the whole house.

  • Trump, 78, says ‘only stupid people put old’ people in top federal roles

    Jump

  • The even bigger problem is holding ourselves to a higher standard than they do and setting the expectation that we will always do this while they've long ago lowered their standards that they never will.

    This results in us wasting time and effort and leads to infighting for messaging that will never reach their side because they already dismissed the article, it is click bait for us not them.

    So while we're over here pearl clutching over a random click bait article, they've already moved the conversation forward.