Actually upon further parsing, the statement cannot be true as it a end result reduction.
So while removing them also removes their ability to be victims which does help quite a bit, to get to 80% white men alone would need to commit 90% of violent crimes. Its easier to hit 70%, since only about 60% would need to be from white men but then we still need to account for maga's percentage. The raw numbers including white men of any political affiliation max out at around 60%
And statistics makes this all really hard just to describing, showing the math around it is a mess.
The statement can be made true by more carefully wording it. For example if it was demostic terrorism instead of violent crime. Which I'm going to pretend is where my confusion comes from because I've done the numbers on that one before and I recall it being around that range. I think there is something on ourworldindata for that one.
The part about children is impossible because a lot of women commit crimes against their own children.
Other rich people, yes. Their children are handed positions other work towards for decades.
The point I'm trying to make is that think you can remove yourself from the machine by fucking off into nature plays to their favor.
Also, not doing things because the wealth do it, is reactionary. What matters is who; extend the hand beyond one's tight socioeconomic group, reach downward and pull up.
Slowly, naturally and directly in your personal environment, where you have the most influence.
This is literally what wealthy people do and it greatly upsets of the non-wealthy.
The rugged individualist lifestyle is most benefiticial to the wealthy. People in that mindset aren't honest with themselves on all the ways they feed the machine.
Is making an assumption that since most white males in that age range are maga and most white males have a higher rate of violent crime than the general population, those who are violent criminals are more lllelt to be maga. That is correlation and it is used all over in statistics.
I cannot think of a single time a software project requires any of that.
There is a insanely vast gap between the handful of jobs whose output literally save lives and grinding on a software project to hit a deadline. You've literally described the work ethic the post is cautioning against.
One can still be out of contact by simply not responding. A mobile devices can be disconnected from the network easier than a house with multiple lan lines, just turn it off.
Drug dealers need to know it's an 1/8th?