Skip Navigation

Posts
13
Comments
610
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I get it, and to an extent I can appreciate it, but personally I can never give these people any benefit of the doubt

  • You can

  • they are becoming popular enough to threat red and blue

    Context clues

    it's designed to

    Doesn't mean it works

  • Sorry this took so long!

    Please excuse the mess, we are living out of a motel

  • While we may not agree on her trying to be diplomatic, this is very well said

  • Don't spill the beans

  • Thank you for being reasonable

  • Bewildering. They type so well for someone that has trouble reading

  • Solar is horrible, I'm a big fan of solar energy

  • Oooooooh got 'imm!!!1!

  • Mehdi Hasan: So you called Netanyahu one, which I think he is.

    Jill Stein: Yeah. Well, let me say this. We are sponsoring that war. We are sponsoring Netanyahu. He is our dog in this fight. That is why we have a responsibility to pull him back.

    Mehdi Hasan: No disagreement from me at all. It still doesn't answer my question. Whether we sponsor them or not is irrelevant.

    Do yourself a favor

  • Say weird some more. We aren't going to be desensitized to it. The right will still be fucking weird

  • He literally said he didn't disagree that Netanyahu is a war criminal. This is your own logic you are arguing with. Absolutely amazing

  • By your same logic, Stein didn't call Putin a war criminal

  • I bet there are reading comprehension help videos on YouTube

  • In so many words, yes she did. Wait, why does a clear yes have so many words?

  • Unless she can say the words 'Putin is a war criminal' she is avoiding the question. "In so many words" is not a yes. I understand she follows with yes he is, but why can't she just say yes, Putin is a war criminal?

  • She had no problem with Biden and Netanyahu, but avoids a direct answer over Putin. It is painfully obvious

  • Young woman posts pictures of herself for people to follow and pay for. Older men pay for them. Everybody wins