It's not that the beliefs are different, it's that the content of the beliefs are abhorrent, backwards, wrong, and/or just plain stupid. I don't mind competing beliefs that are not based on fantasy or are not obvious con jobs or are not obvious lies to protect powerful pedos or obvious red herrings to distract from obvious facts and obvious lies. Why don't you try supplying some of those and see if you don't stop get pissed on from up high while wallowing down low in the gutter with those opinions.
There's nothing conflicting or controversial in this post. Trauma, harm, toxicity, gaslighting, verbal violence are all sadly quite ordinary experiences. This person is just pointing out the language, surely no therapist could be that careless and unempathetic.
So... if I'm reading this correctly, simply observing the fact of moderator's existence is against the rules under the sole discretion of the moderator-being-regarded? And the exclusive written remedy for this infraction is the removal of the relevant comment? And you don't see a conflict of personal and professional interest or how the combination of your actions and the rules are perceived to be a power trip.
Money is speech, corporations are people, "we the people in order to form a more perfect union" has become "we the companies in order to form a more exploitable customer base"
Everytime I think I'm doing well enough to "put myself out there" I crash out again. I think I'll probably die alone.