You were wrong but you came to a reasonable conclusion based on the evidence you had at the time, and really not even a conclusion but a reasonably suspicious ask on consideration. I further commend you for correcting yourself when confronted with new evidence that challenged your original idea.
they are, and he didnt flee. 'fleeing' suggests he evaded capture and made his own way to israel. actually he was allowed to leave after his lawful arrest without explanation and in direct contradiction to state and federal law.
...In all cases of aiding and abetting, it must be shown a crime has been committed, but not necessarily who committed it. It is necessary to show that the defendant has willfully associated himself with the crime being committed, that he does ... as he would do if he wished for a criminal venture to succeed. Under this statute, anyone who aids or abets a crime may be charged directly with the crime, as if the charged had carried out the act himself.
someone let this guy out of jail after he was arrested, knowing he was a flight risk. someone had to out of their way- much more probably, several people had to go significantly out of their way to make that happen. People don't just fall out of jail. or maybe they do, sometimes, but hey totally unrelated question: who the fuck put convicted serial child sex trafficker Ghislane Maxwell in a minimum security prison (for which she, as a sex offender, was not eligible) while providing her with work-release authorization so that she can leave during the day? Incidentally, did you know that Jeffrey Epstein was allowed work release as a part of his sweetheart deal, and used that opportunity to continue raping children?
And its not like putin is gonna drop nuclear bombs cause thats suicide
doesn't putin have cancer? what can putin expect if this war fails? does putin actually have the incentives of a reasonable and calm decision maker as your analysis seems to assume, or are his incentives more in line with the extremity of desperation and corruption? If he fails, suicide-by-nuclear-armageddon could just be a way of taking his power back. If he can't play who's to say he wont stab big holes in his ball- all our balls- before he fucks off home? What makes you think that genocidal maniac won't burn the whole world down if he can't be king if he thinks that's within his power?
isn't that a direct contradiction? If I'm causally disconnected from a region, in what sense am I "inside" that region? I am causally disconnected from the past, am I in the past? I am causally disconnected from regions of space that are expanding away from me faster than the speed of light, am I "in" those regions in any sense?
i thought i was the only one who thought of that...