This is Trump being mad at the situation regarding Eric Adams' trial and the refusal of the SDNY to drop the prosecution without prejudice in a quid pro quo scheme. They are trying to avoid people putting the constitution before the word of the Supreme Leader in the future.
I know the US left all sense of rule of law a while ago, but theoretically, isn't this order against the civil rights act as a type of gender discrimination?
I mean, was he wrong? Insurrection, separation of powers, no one being above the law, Roe. v. Wade, etc. I would say that since 2021 the constitution has not really meant that much apparently.
Alright, I might be wrong then. The reason I speculated they did that, is that it plays ads at the beginning and end of every episode that are localized to my region and up to date, even though it's an old, foreign podcast I'm listening to. But maybe it's the podcast itself being able to do that dynamically instead? Then I don't mind it as much as I do want to support the creators.
The real rich elite are not choosing between Paris or Barcelona. People who have to choose one of the destinations cause they can only afford one are not the enemy. The real rich people have waaaay more money.
A good way would be to create as many variables as possible that map anything relevant, genes, upbringing, sexual and gender expression, etc., and then doing a PCA to reduce the defining vector to as few elements as possible.
I was hoping this would be here.